USA For Jemez, Santa, et al v. Abousleman, et al
Filing
4463
ORDER REFERRING CASE by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. This case is referred to MAGISTRATE JUDGE JERRY H. RITTER to conduct hearings, if warranted, including evidentiary hearings, and to perform any legal analysis required to recommend to the Court an ultimate disposition of the case. (ve)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, on its
own behalf and on behalf of the
PUEBLOS OF JEMEZ, SANTA ANA, and ZIA,
and
STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel.
State Engineer,
Plaintiffs,
No. 6:83-cv-01041-KWR-JHR
JEMEZ RIVER ADJUDICATION
and
THE PUEBLOS OF JEMEZ, SANTA ANA, and ZIA,
Plaintiffs-in-Intervention,
v.
TOM ABOUSLEMAN, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER REFERRING CASE
Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B), (b) (3) and Virginia Beach Federal
Savings & Loan Association v. Wood, 901 F.2d 849 (10th Cir. 1990), this case is referred to
MAGISTRATE JUDGE JERRY H. RITTER to conduct hearings, if warranted, including
evidentiary hearings, and to perform any legal analysis required to recommend to the Court an
ultimate disposition of the case.
The Magistrate Judge shall submit an analysis, including
findings of fact, if necessary, and recommended disposition, to the District Judge assigned to the
case, with copies provided to the parties. The parties shall be given the opportunity to object to
the proposed findings, analysis and disposition as described in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Objections shall be filed within fourteen (14) days of the date of entry of the proposed
disposition.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
_________________________________
KEA W. RIGGS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?