In Re: United States of America & State of NM v. A & R Productions, et al
Filing
3538
ORDER OF REFERENCE by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. This case is referred to MAGISTRATE JUDGE JERRY H. RITTER to conduct hearings, if warranted, including evidentiary hearings, and to perform any legal analysis required to recommend to the Court an ultimate disposition of the case. (ve)
Case 6:01-cv-00072-KWR-JHR Document 3538 Filed 01/10/22 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
and STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel.
STATE ENGINEER,
Plaintiffs,
and
ZUNI INDIAN TRIBE and NAVAJO NATION,
Plaintiffs-in-Intervention,
v.
No. 6:01-cv-00072-KWR-JHR
A & R PRODUCTIONS, et al.,
ZUNI RIVER BASIN
ADJUDICATION
Defendants.
ORDER OF REFERENCE
IN ACCORDANCE with the provisions 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(B), (b)(3), and Va.
Beach Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Wood, 901 F.2d 849 (10th Cir. 1990) this case is referred to
MAGISTRATE JUDGE JERRY H. RITTER to conduct hearings, if warranted, including
evidentiary hearings, and to perform any legal analysis required to recommend to the Court an
ultimate disposition of the case. The Magistrate Judge will submit an analysis, including
findings of fact, if necessary, and recommended disposition, to the District Judge assigned to the
case, with copies provided to the parties. The parties will be given the opportunity to object to
the proposed findings, analysis, and disposition as described in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of
the proposed disposition.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
_________________________________
KEA W. RIGGS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?