-RML Chubb & Son Inc., et al v. Kelleher, et al
Filing
1580
JUDGMENT re 1578 : Pursuant to the grant of summary judgment against defendant Elliot Zerring, the plaintiffs are entitled to a judgment against Zerring for $16,414,746.14 in damages, plus $8,930,409.40 in pre-judgment interest accrued on the common law fraud damages through March 28, 2011, plus $74,621.91 in additional interest accrued through September 27, 2011. This equals a total damages judgment against Zerring of $25,419,777.45. Ordered by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 9/27/2011. c/m to pro se pltf by chambers (Fernandez, Erica)
Case 0:92-cv-04484-TLM-RML Document 1580 Filed 09/27/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1665
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------------X
CHUBB & SON INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
92 CV 4484 (TLM)(RML)
- against MICHAEL J. KELLEHER, et al.,
Defendants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------X
CHUBB & SON INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
95 CV 0951 (CBA)(RML)
- against JAMES KELLEHER, et al.,
PARTIAL JUDGMENT
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
Defendants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------X
AMON, Chief United States District Judge:
On March 7, 2011, this Court adopted a Report and Recommendation (R&R) of the
Honorable Robert M. Levy, dated October 22, 2010, recommending that plaintiffs’ motion for
partial summary judgment against defendant Elliot Zerring be granted and that plaintiffs be
awarded treble damages of $22,145,806.65, minus set-offs for prior recoveries, plus prejudgment interest at a rate of nine percent per annum on the common law fraud damages. The
Court directed the plaintiffs to submit a damages calculation, which they did on March 28, 2011
(case no. 92-cv-4484, docket entry #1578). Defendant Zerring was provided with a copy of this
calculation and has not objected.
Having reviewed these documents, the Court finds that the total amount of set-offs to the
plaintiffs’ claims against Zerring is $5,731,060.51. This is slightly higher than the amount
provided in plaintiffs’ calculation ($5,728,182.66), which contained a slight arithmetical error.
Case 0:92-cv-04484-TLM-RML Document 1580 Filed 09/27/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1666
Based on the Court’s own calculation, Nicholas Addesa was liable for a total of $2,845,404.53 of
Interstate’s fraudulent claims (the Eastbank Corp., Foxx & DeLorenzo, Nicon Plastics,
Techknits, Criterion Bead, and both Damast claims added together), thus making 28.14% (or
$36,550.89) of the recovery obtained from Addesa allocable to the Zerring judgment as a set-off.
(See docket entry #1578, Ex. A.)
This total set-off amount is subtracted from the trebled damages, leaving a total damages
recovery of $16,414,746.14.
The Court has also reviewed the plaintiffs’ calculation of pre-judgment interest on the
common law fraud damages, and finds the amount of $8,930,409.40 in interest accrued through
March 28, 2011 to be accurate. The Court will also award additional pre-judgment interest
accruing at a per diem rate of $407.77 for each day after March 28, 2011 until the entry of
judgment.
The Court will not, however, award the additional $1,650,875.04 of unrecovered
principal on the common law fraud damages (which remains after the prior recoveries have been
subtracted). First, this amount was not included in the final calculation in the R&R that this
Court adopted. See Chubb & Son Inc. v. Kelleher, 2010 WL 5978913, at *9 (E.D.N.Y. 2010).
Second, the plaintiffs have already been compensated for the common law fraud through the
treble damages awarded under the RICO statute, since the measure of damages for both the
RICO and common law fraud claims was the total amount of settlements paid out on the
fraudulent insurance claims. Id. at *6. To award this remaining principal on the common law
fraud counts, in addition to the treble damages, would in effect amount to a quadruple recovery.
See Nagoya Venture Ltd. v. Bacopulos, 1999 WL 311918, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) (“Since the
Case 0:92-cv-04484-TLM-RML Document 1580 Filed 09/27/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1667
common law damages compensate for the same loss as the RICO award . . . plaintiffs are not
entitled to double recovery for the same loss.”)
The Court thus concludes that the plaintiffs are entitled to a judgment against Zerring for
$16,414,746.14 in damages, plus $8,930,409.40 in pre-judgment interest accrued on the common
law fraud damages through March 28, 2011, plus $74,621.91 in additional interest accrued
through September 27, 2011. This equals a total damages judgment against Zerring of
$25,419,777.45.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: Brooklyn, New York
September 27, 2011
______________/s/_____________
Carol Bagley Amon
Chief United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?