-JO Jacob Friedman, Estelle Sapir and Miriam Stern, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Union Bank of Switzerland, et al. (See Doc. No. 897)

Filing 4712

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Approving CRT Set 21:1 Summary Denial to an appeal as Certified by the Claims Resolution Tribunal Pursuant to Article 30 of the Rules Governing the Claims Resolution Process. Ordered by Senior Judge Edward R. Korman on 6/15/2011. (Greene, Donna)

FILED
IN CLERK'S OFFICE
US DISTRICT COURT E.D.N.Y•

..

*

JUL 2 9 2011

*

tUjITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

&STERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

x

BROOKLYN OFFICE
Case No. CV 96-4849 (ERK)(MDG)
(Consolidated with CV 96-5161
and CV 97-461)

IN RE: HOLOCAUST VICTIM ASSETS
LITIGATION

MEMORANDUM & ORDER
This Document Relates to: All Cases

x
MEMORANDUM & ORDER APPROVING CRT SET 21: 1 SUMMARY DENIAL TO AN
APPEAL AS CERTIFIED BY THE CLAIMS RESOLUTION TRIBUNAL PURSUANT TO
ARTICLE 30 OF THE RULES GOVERNING THE CLAIMS RESOLUTION PROCESS

KORMAN,J.:
As provided under the Settlement Agreement, and in accordance with the procedures
established in the December 8, 2000 and December 14, 2006 Memoranda & Orders and in the Plan
of Allocation and Distribution of Settlement Proceeds, the Claims Resolution Tribunal (the "CRT")
is hereby requesting the Court's approval of the CRT's twenty-first set of appeal decisions consisting
of 1 Summary Denial based upon an Appeal submitted to the CRT. This set includes 1 Summary
Denial to an Appeal of a Certified Award Denial listed in Annex A to this Order.
Under Article 30 of the Rules Governing the Claims Resolution Process, as amended (the
"Rules"), an appeal must be based upon a plausible suggestion of error regarding the conclusions
reached by the CRT.
summarily denied.

Any appeals submitted without a plausible suggestion of error shall be

At my direction, the CRT has analyzed the information provided in the

Appeal listed in Annex A.

Upon careful consideration, the CRT has concluded that the

Appellant whose claims are listed in Annex A did not raise a plausible suggestion of error in the
CRT's findings. Accordingly, the CRT recommends that this Appeal be summarily denied.

-.
I have reviewed the CRT's analyze and I concur with the CRT's recommendations.
Therefore, it is
ORDERED that the Appeal to the claims listed in Annex A shall be summarily denied and
the relevant Appellants so informed;

It is further ordered that the CRT shall provide the Court with the name and address of every
Appellant whose appeal is herewith summarily denied, which information shall be filed with the
Court under seal.
Dated:

Brooklyp(New York
JuneL~2011

~ERED:

s/Edward R. Korman
Edwafd R. Korman
United States District Judge