-JO Jacob Friedman, Estelle Sapir and Miriam Stern, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Union Bank of Switzerland, et al. (See Doc. No. 897)

Filing 4712

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Approving CRT Set 21:1 Summary Denial to an appeal as Certified by the Claims Resolution Tribunal Pursuant to Article 30 of the Rules Governing the Claims Resolution Process. Ordered by Senior Judge Edward R. Korman on 6/15/2011. (Greene, Donna)

Download PDF
FILED IN CLERK'S OFFICE US DISTRICT COURT E.D.N.Y• .. * JUL 2 9 2011 * tUjITED STATES DISTRICT COURT &STERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x BROOKLYN OFFICE Case No. CV 96-4849 (ERK)(MDG) (Consolidated with CV 96-5161 and CV 97-461) IN RE: HOLOCAUST VICTIM ASSETS LITIGATION MEMORANDUM & ORDER This Document Relates to: All Cases x MEMORANDUM & ORDER APPROVING CRT SET 21: 1 SUMMARY DENIAL TO AN APPEAL AS CERTIFIED BY THE CLAIMS RESOLUTION TRIBUNAL PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 30 OF THE RULES GOVERNING THE CLAIMS RESOLUTION PROCESS KORMAN,J.: As provided under the Settlement Agreement, and in accordance with the procedures established in the December 8, 2000 and December 14, 2006 Memoranda & Orders and in the Plan of Allocation and Distribution of Settlement Proceeds, the Claims Resolution Tribunal (the "CRT") is hereby requesting the Court's approval of the CRT's twenty-first set of appeal decisions consisting of 1 Summary Denial based upon an Appeal submitted to the CRT. This set includes 1 Summary Denial to an Appeal of a Certified Award Denial listed in Annex A to this Order. Under Article 30 of the Rules Governing the Claims Resolution Process, as amended (the "Rules"), an appeal must be based upon a plausible suggestion of error regarding the conclusions reached by the CRT. summarily denied. Any appeals submitted without a plausible suggestion of error shall be At my direction, the CRT has analyzed the information provided in the Appeal listed in Annex A. Upon careful consideration, the CRT has concluded that the Appellant whose claims are listed in Annex A did not raise a plausible suggestion of error in the CRT's findings. Accordingly, the CRT recommends that this Appeal be summarily denied. -. I have reviewed the CRT's analyze and I concur with the CRT's recommendations. Therefore, it is ORDERED that the Appeal to the claims listed in Annex A shall be summarily denied and the relevant Appellants so informed; It is further ordered that the CRT shall provide the Court with the name and address of every Appellant whose appeal is herewith summarily denied, which information shall be filed with the Court under seal. Dated: Brooklyp(New York JuneL~2011 ~ERED: s/Edward R. Korman Edwafd R. Korman United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?