-JO Jacob Friedman, Estelle Sapir and Miriam Stern, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Union Bank of Switzerland, et al. (See Doc. No. 897)
Filing
4718
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Approving 1 Administrative Revision of an Award Certified by the Claims Resolution Tribunal Pursuant to Article 31(2) of the Rules Governing the Claims Resolution Process. Ordered by Senior Judge Edward R. Korman on 7/29/2011. (Greene, Donna)
FILED
IN CLERK'S OFFICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT US DISTRICT COURT E.D.N.V.
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------*----.AlJG 0
1 2011
IN RE: HOLOCAUST VICTIM ASSETS
LITIGATION
BROOKLYN
...
)("'
Case No. CV 96-4849 (ERK)(MDG)
FFICE (Consolidated with CV 96-5161
0
.
and CV 97-461)
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
This Document Relates to: All Cases
x
MEMORANDUM & ORDER APPROVING 1 ADMINISTRATIVE REVISION OF
AN AWARD CERTIFIED BY THE CLAIMS RESOLUTION TRIBUNAL
PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 31(2) OF THE RULES GOVERNING THE CLAIMS
RESOLUTION PROCESS
KORMAN,J.:
As provided under the Settlement Agreement, and in accordance with the procedures
established in the December 8, 2000 Memorandum & Order and in the Distribution Plan, the
Claims Resolution Tribunal (the "CRT") is hereby requesting the Court's approval, pursuant
to Article 31(2) of the Rules., of 1 certified Administrative Revision of an Award listed in
AnnexA.
The Administrative Revision In re Stark (see Annex) addresses an Award that was
approved on 16 October 2008.
This Award is not substantively changed by the
Administrative Revision. The corrected version shall be published on the CRT's website
upon my approval.
Therefore, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Award In re Stark be corrected to reflect the Administrative Revision
included in this set;
Dated:
Brooklyn, New York
July Z(2011
SO~EREI2:
s/Edward R. Korman
Edward RKorman
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?