-LB Castellar v. Caporale et al

Filing 146

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 142 Motion to Compel. See attached Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom on 9/23/2010. (Rabiee, Lara)

Download PDF
-LB Castellar v. Caporale et al Doc. 146 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------X MARCO FIDEL CASTELLAR, Plaintiff, -againstMICHAEL CAPORALE, et. al., Defendants. -----------------------------------------------------X BLOOM, United States Magistrate Judge: The Court held a status conference on September 21, 2010 and made the following rulings: plaintiff's motion to proceed pro se is denied as moot as he has retained a new attorney. Plaintiff's motion for a protective order is denied as the confidentiality order dated January 22, 2007 governs all medical documents exchanged in this matter. Defendants' request to re-depose plaintiff regarding any treatment he has received since his deposition is denied as unnecessary. Plaintiff shall provide a sworn statement to defendants' counsel listing the names and addresses of all medical or mental health professionals who have treated or examined plaintiff since the events alleged in his complaint by October 1, 2010. Plaintiff is hereby ordered to appear for his independent medical examination on October 13, 2010 and independent psychiatric examination on October 21, 2010. The parties shall exchange expert reports by December 1, 2010 and rebuttal expert reports, if any, by December 15, 2010. The parties shall file their joint pre-trial order by January 27, 2011. The Clerk of Court shall terminate Louis Zepetelli as a defendant in this matter. SO ORDERED. /S/ LOIS BLOOM United States Magistrate Judge ORDER 04 CV 3402 (DGT)(LB) Dated: September 23, 2010 Brooklyn, New York Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?