Hudson v. Klein et al
Filing 137
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The court thus concludes that, even assuming that Plaintiffs were deprived of constitutionally protected property and liberty interests, they recieved all of the process to which they were entitled. Additionally, the court concl udes that the Department acted within its statutory aurthority. Because their is no basis for liability on the part of the Department, there is no basis for liability on the part of individual Defendants. See Demoret v. Zegarelli, 451 F .3d 140, 148 (2d Cir. 2006). Accordingly, Defendants' motions for summary judgment are GRANTED and Plaintffs' motions for summary judmgent are DENIED. Plaintiffs' claims are dismissed with prejudice. Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 2/18/2010. Fwded for judgment. (Abdallah, Fida)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
