Audrey v. Career Institute of Health and Technology et al

Filing 47

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The plaintiff's case is dismissed for failure to prosecute. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 12/28/2016. (Greene, Donna)

FILfcD

IN CLERK'S OFFICE
"LERK'S OFFK

US DISTRICT COURT E.D.N.Y.
RICT COURT i

DEC 2 8 2016 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

X

BROOKLYN OFFICE

KRISTIN AUDREY,
Plaintiff,
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND

ORDER

- against 06-CV-05612(AMD)(SMG)
CAREER INSTITUTE OF HEALTH AND

TECHNOLOGY and DR.KLEBER MOLINA,
Defendants.

X

ANN DONNELLY,District Judge.

The plaintiff brought this action against defendants Career Institute of Health and

Technology and Dr. Kleber Molina on October 17, 2006, alleging gender discrimination,
retaliation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress under federal and New York state and

city laws. In a Report and Recommendation issued on December 6,2016, Magistrate Judge
Steven M.Gold recommended that the plaintiffs complaint be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

No party has objected to Judge Gold's Report and Recommendation within the time prescribed
by 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(l).

In reviewing an R&R,a district court"may accept, reject, or modify,in whole or in part,
the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

Where,as here, no party has objected to the magistrate judge's recommendation,"a district court
need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face ofthe record." Urena v. New York,

s/Ann M. Donnelly