Dimaria et al v. Fasulo et al

Filing 250

ORDER: For the reasons stated on the record at the March 20, 2024 Final Approval (Fairness) Hearing, and as stated in the attached Order, Plaintiffs' 249 Motion to Certify Class, Give Final Approval to Class Action Settlement, Approve Case Contribution Awards, and Release Claims is granted. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 3/20/2024. (AH)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARK PALUMBO, ROSARIO PRATO, ) MAURICIO MARTINEZ, and JOSEPH ) OVILE as participants and/or former ) participants of the Pavers and Road Builders ) District Council Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, ) Apprenticeship, Skill Improvement and Safety ) Fund and the United Plant and Production ) Workers Local 175 Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, and Apprenticeship, Skill Improvement ) and Safety Fund, on behalf of themselves and ) ) all persons similarly situated, ) Plaintiffs, ) vs. ) ANTHONY FASULO, ALBERT ALIMENA, ) DOMINICK AGOSTINO, JOHN PETERS, ) ROBERT CHEVERIE, FRANCISCO ) FERNANDEZ, JAMES KILKENNEY, ) PHILIP FAICCO, VINCENT MASINO, ) ANTHONY ROBIBERO and KEITH LOSCALZO and/or their successors, in their ) capacity as present and former Trustees of the ) ) Pavers and Road Builders District Council Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Apprenticeship, ) Skill Improvement and Safety Fund and the ) PAVERS AND ROAD BUILDERS ) DISTRICT COUNCIL PENSION FUND, ) WELFARE FUND, and APPRENTICESHIP, ) SKILL IMPROVEMENT AND SAFETY ) FUND, ) Defendants. ) Case No.: 07-CV-797 (PKC) (RML) ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL TO THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, GRANTING FINAL CLASS CERTIFICATION, APPROVING CASE CONTRIBUTION AWARDS AND RELEASING WELFARE CLAIMS A hearing having been held before this Court (the “Court”) on March 20, 2024, pursuant to this Court’s Order dated December 1, 2023 (the “Preliminary Approval Order”), upon a Settlement and Release Agreement dated October 10, 2023 (the “Settlement Agreement”) filed in the above-captioned action (the “Action”), which along with the Preliminary Approval Order is incorporated herein by reference; it appearing that due notice of said hearing has been given in accordance with the aforesaid Preliminary Approval Order; the respective parties (“Parties”) having appeared by their attorneys of record; the Court having heard and considered evidence in support of the proposed settlement (the “Settlement”) set forth in the Settlement Agreement; the attorneys for the respective Parties having been heard; an opportunity to be heard having been given to all other persons requesting to be heard in accordance with the Preliminary Approval Order; the Court having determined that notice to the Class (as defined in Appendix A to this Order, sometimes referred to individually as “Class Members”) was adequate and sufficient; and the entire matter of the proposed Settlement having been heard and considered by the Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED, THIS 20th DAY OF MARCH, 2024, AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Court finds that (i) it has personal jurisdiction over all parties and Class Members; (ii) it has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims asserted in the Action; and (iii) venue is proper. 2. The court-approved class notices regarding the pendency of this class action and notice of the Final Approval (“Fairness”) Hearing, which were mailed directly to the last known addresses of Class Members and posted in the offices of Defendant Pavers and Road Builders District Council Welfare Fund and non-party United Plant and Production Workers Local 175 Welfare Fund (“Class Notices”), have been given to the Class pursuant to, and in the manner directed by, the Preliminary Approval Order. Proof of the mailing and publication of the Class Notices has been filed with the Court and full opportunity to be heard has been offered to all Parties to the Action, the Class and 2 persons in interest. Moreover, Class Members have been offered the opportunity to object to the Settlement. The form and manner of disseminating the Class Notices are hereby determined to have been the best notice practicable under the circumstances and to have been given in full compliance with each of the requirements of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”), the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution, and applicable law, and it is further determined that all Class Members are bound by this Order Granting Final Judgment and the Settlement Agreement, as are their spouses, children, representatives, heirs, administrators, executors, beneficiaries, conservators, attorneys and assigns except as provided in the Settlement Agreement. 3. Based on the record of the Action, the Court expressly and conclusively finds, pursuant to Rules 23(a), 23(b)(1) and 23(g) of the Fed. R. Civ. P., as follows: a. that (i) the Class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable, (ii) there are questions of law and fact common to the Class, (iii) the claims of Mark Palumbo, Rosario Prato, Mauricio Martinez and Joseph Ovile (collectively, “Named Plaintiffs”) are typical of the claims of the Class, and (iv) Named Plaintiffs and their counsel have fairly and adequately protected the interests of the Class; and b. that prosecuting separate actions by or against individual Class Members would create a risk of inconsistent adjudications that would establish incompatible standards of conduct for Defendants, and adjudications with respect to individual class members would be dispositive of the interests of 3 other class members, and c. that Named Plaintiffs are adequate and typical representatives of the Settlement Class that was conditionally certified by this Court by an order dated December 1, 2023, and have fairly and adequately protected the interests of the class, and d. Jennifer S. Smith of the Law Offices of Jennifer Smith PLLC and David New of the Law Office of David W. New, PC are adequate counsel for the Class and have fairly and adequately represented the interests of the Class. 4. The Action is finally certified as a class action pursuant to FRCP 23(a) and 23(b)(1) on behalf of a Class consisting all persons listed on Appendix A to this Order. Named Plaintiffs Mark Palumbo, Rosario Prato, Mauricio Martinez and Joseph Ovile are certified as the representatives of the Class. Jennifer S. Smith of the Law Offices of Jennifer Smith PLLC, One Liberty Plaza, 165 Broadway, 23rd Floor, New York, NY 10006, and David W. New of the Law Office of David W. New, PC, PO Box 447, Rutherford, NJ 07070, are certified as Class Counsel pursuant to FRCP 23(g). 5. The Settlement Agreement and the terms of the Settlement as described in the Settlement Agreement are found to be fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the best interests of the Class, and are hereby approved pursuant to FRCP 23(e). 6. The Parties are hereby authorized and directed to comply with and to implement the Settlement in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Settlement Agreement, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter and docket this Order Granting Final Approval. 4 7. This Order Granting Final Approval shall not constitute any evidence or admission by any party herein that any acts of wrongdoing have been committed by any of the Parties to the Action and should not be deemed to create any inference that there is any liability therefor. 8. The Court hereby approves the total amount of the Settlement Fund of One Million Nine Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($1,925,000.00) to fully resolve and satisfy the Welfare Claims, to be paid by Defendants in the manner and within the time specified in the Settlement Agreement. 9. Named Plaintiffs Mark Palumbo, Rosario Prato, Mauricio Martinez and Joseph Ovile are hereby awarded $1,500 each (“Case Contribution Awards”) in order to reimburse them for the time and expenses they incurred, including their time spent on prosecuting the Action, which amount the Court finds to be fair and reasonable and which Case Contribution Awards shall be paid by Defendants from the Settlement Fund to said Named Plaintiffs in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement. 10. The proposed Settlement with the Defendants, which is reflected in the Settlement Agreement and exhibits attached to the Declaration of Jennifer S. Smith as Exhibit “D” and incorporated by reference herein and made a part of this Order, appears to have been negotiated at arms-length and appears to be the product of serious, informed, non-collusive negotiations, has no obvious deficiencies, and will not improperly grant preferential treatment to the class representatives or segments of the class. The proposed Settlement appears to be fair, reasonable, adequate and in the best interests of the Class when balanced against the potential outcome of further litigation relating to class 5 certification, defenses, liability and damages, and will avoid substantial costs, delay and risks that would be presented by the further prosecution of the litigation. 11. The Court finds that no objections to the Settlement were received from Class Members. 12. By operation of this Order Granting Final Judgment on all claims remaining in this Action (the “Welfare Claims”), and except as to such rights or claims as may be created by the Settlement Agreement, each Class Member (the “Releasors”) shall be deemed to have fully and irrevocably released and discharged (a) the Defendants, any and all of their past and present parents, subsidiaries, divisions, affiliates, related entities, employee benefit, welfare, and/or training plans or funds, successors and assigns and any and all of their past and present directors, officers, agents, contractors, trustees, administrators, attorneys, employees and assigns (whether acting as agents for Defendants, their affiliates or related entities); and (b) the Named Plaintiffs, their heirs, executors, administrators, trustees, legal representatives, successors and assigns; (Defendants and Named Plaintiffs are collectively referred to as “Releasees”) from any and all claims, demands, causes of action and liabilities including, without limitation, all claims for damages of any kind, interest, attorneys’ fees and costs, based on, arising out of, or related to the Welfare Claims that were or could have been raised in this Action, by reason of any act, omission, transaction or occurrence, that Releasors ever had, now have or may have against any and/or all of the Releasees up to and including the date of execution of the Settlement Agreement, under any contract, statute, regulation, agreement, duty or otherwise including, but not limited to punitive damages, attorneys' fees and costs. This 6 release shall not affect the right of Class Members or their beneficiaries to claim any pension or welfare benefits from the Defendants, Local 175 Welfare Fund or Local 175 Training Fund to which they remain entitled under the terms of the relevant plan documents. 13. The Releasors shall be bound by the Settlement Agreement and all of its terms and all determinations and judgments in the matter concerning the Settlement, including, but not limited to, the mutual releases provided for in the Settlement Agreement. 14. The Court hereby retains jurisdiction relating to the administration, implementation, enforcement, and interpretation of the Settlement Agreement and the Order Granting Final Approval. The Court may issue such related orders as needed to effectuate the final approval of the Settlement Agreement and its implementation. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 20th day of March, 2024. /s/ Pamela K. Chen HON. PAMELA K. CHEN United States District Judge 7 APPENDIX A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 MICHAEL ABBATE DOMINICK AGOSTINO ROCCO AGOSTINO ANGELO ALAIMO SALVATORE G. ALAIMO GIOACCHINO ALAIMO ROSARIO ARNONE SALVATORE ARNONE ANTONIO ASTUTO GIOACCHINO AUGELLO EDGAR F. AUQUILLA MICHAEL A. BARRETTO MICHAEL BARTILUCCI ROLAND F. BEDWELL JHOANI D. BETANCES EDWARD BOLIJONIS ALVIN A. BRATHWAITE DOMENCIO F. BRUNO NICHOLAS CACACE MANUEL CANDO ROBERT CARAMANNO JOSEPH T. CARAMANNO FRANCO CARDILLO DERECK CARTER MARCELINO CASTILLO WILL R. CASTILLO JESSIE CHAMBERS JOHN A. CHIARELLI CHARLIE CINQUEMANI ANDREW CINQUEMANI CARMELO CINQUEMANI GUISEPPE CINQUEMANI CARMINE J. COMITO ANTONIO CONTE PASQUALE CONTE JOAQUIM C. CORREA NELSON CRUZ JAMES V. DADABO LOUIS F. DADABO REGINALD DAVIS VICTOR DE GENESTE AURELIO DELIZ GIUSEPPE DI CARO ANTHONY DI MAIO CALOGERO DI MARIA WILLIAM DOUGHTY GENNARO ELVEZIO CALOGERO FALZONE CHARLIE FALZONE MICHAEL FARRELL 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 8 MICHAEL FERMIN GREGORY J. FERRO KENNETH S. FERST PATRICK FOGARILE SALVATORE, SR. GAMBINO JOSEPH GERMANO ROBERT GOLABEK LUIS R. GOMEZ LOUIS T. GONZALEZ GUSTAVO GUERRERO TIMOTHY A. HINDS TODD HOLDER PASQUALE LABATE ROBERT A. LE CRICHIA PHILIP G. LENTINI ALFONSO LETO JAMES J. LOMBARDI VINCENZO LUPO ROBERT MARESCO MAURICIO MARTINEZ MEDRADO MAZA ALFONSO MESSINA GIOVANNI MESSINA GIUSEPPE MICELI JOHN A. MORELLO PETER MORELLO WILLIAM J. MORTENSEN FELICE MOTTOLA UBALDO MURIALE SHANNON D. OLIVER JOSEPH S. OVILE MARK A. PALUMBO CHARLES PARKER, JR. GLEN PATRICK PIETRO PECORARO SALVATORE PECORARO STEFANO PECORARO MICHAEL A. PIETRANICO ANGELO PIRRERA JOSEPH POPOLIZIO ROSARIO PRATO CHARLIE PRIOLO MICHAEL T. PROPER MARTIR RAMIREZ LEONARDO RANDAZZO DAVID RENDON CESAR RODRIGUEZ STEVE ROJAS GREG SCHMALTZ GEORGE SCHMIDT 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 GIOVANNI SCIOVE NICHOLAS V. SCORCIA CONSTANTINE SEMINATORE PAUL SEMPLICE SLADE T. SHAW ANTHONY SHUKRY CHRISTOPHER J. SMITH LEONARD SMITH WILLIAM SMITH JR MICHAEL SOLOMON CARLO SORRENTINO RAYMOND SOTO MASSIMO SPANO ABIP STEBLEVA 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 9 DZELADIN STEBLEVA VULNET STEBLEVA GERARD TESTANI PETER L. TESTANI VITO TEUTONICO DEVON A. THOMAS VINCENT TOPPI GIUSEPPE TRIBUZIO MATTHEW TUMMINELLO JOSEPH VITALE LYNDON WATTERS KEVIN WHITE CARLOS R. ZUNIGA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?