Rosioreanu v. NYC Department of Environmental Protection et al
Filing
141
ORDER: As judgment has been entered in this case, defendant's motion 136 for reconsideration is denied. Defendant shall move for judgment as a matter of law or for a new trial within twenty-eight days of the entry of judgment. See attached Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom on 3/16/2012. (Copy mailed to pro se plaintiff) (Turilli, Michael)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------------------------X
CLEOPATRA ROSIOREANU,
Plaintiff,
ORDER
07 CV 2925 (LB)
-againstTHE CITY OF NEW YORK,
Defendant.
-----------------------------------------------------X
BLOOM, United States Magistrate Judge:
Defendant moves for reconsideration of the Court’s Order dated March 15, 2012 on the
ground that the Court “misapprehended Rule 50(b) in ordering defendant[] to serve post-trial
motions by April 12, 2012.” (Docket entry 136.) The Court did not “misapprehend” the Rules.
Post-trial motions under Rule 50(b) or Rule 59 must be filed no later than twenty-eight days after
the entry of judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(b), 59(b), 59(e). Before I entered the Order on March
15, 2012, a judgment was issued in accordance with the jury verdict. (Docket entry 138.) The
judgment was entered on the docket today, March 16, 2012. (Id.) As judgment has been entered
in this case, defendant’s motion for reconsideration is denied.
Defendant shall move for
judgment as a matter of law or for a new trial within twenty-eight days of the entry of judgment.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 16, 2012
Brooklyn, New York
__________/S/_____________
LOIS BLOOM
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?