Winfield v. DeRasso et al
Filing
294
ORDER: Granting 293 Motion to Compel the court to waive the fees associated with viewing the documents on the electronic docket pertaining to this case. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Law Offices of Michael S. Pernesiglio, PLLC be permitted to view the electronically-filed documents pertaining to docket number 1:07-cv-4570 without cost, in order to prepare for the upcoming trial. So Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 11/30/2018. (Ortiz, Grisel)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
JOAQUIN R. WINFIELD,
Plaintiff,
FILED
CLERK
11/30/2018 11:25 am
For Online Publication Only
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
LONG ISLAND OFFICE
ORDER
07-cv-4570 (JMA) (AYS)
-againstROBERT DERASSO, et al.
Defendants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
AZRACK, United States District Judge:
Plaintiff filed the instant action pro se on October 25, 2007. (ECF No. 1.) On July 11,
2018, the Court granted plaintiff’s application for appointment of pro bono counsel. (ECF No.
270.) The Court appointed Michael Pernesiglio, Esq. as pro bono counsel for settlement and, if
necessary, the trial of this case. (Id.) Trial is currently scheduled for December 18, 2018.
On November 29, 2018, pro bono counsel filed a letter motion to waive the fees associated
with viewing the documents on the electronic docket. (ECF No. 293.)
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Law Offices of Michael S. Pernesiglio, PLLC
be permitted to view the electronically-filed documents pertaining to docket number 1:07-cv-4570
without cost, in order to prepare for the upcoming trial.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 30, 2018
Central Islip, New York
/s/ (JMA)
JOAN M. AZRACK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?