Gayle v. Harry's Nurses Registry, Inc. et al

Filing 116

ORDER : The court held oral argument on August 9, 2010, to address Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment. Defendants reiterated their intention (see Docket Entry # 96) to move for reconsideration of Judge Siftoo's liability findings. Defe ndants also explained to the court that their opposition to Plaintiffs' summary judgment motion (Docket Entry # 113) fully covered the arguments that they would make regarding reconsideration. With the consent of the parties, the court converted Defendants' opposition into a motion for reconsideration. Plaintiffs indicated that their opposition to Defendants' motion for reconsideration is fully addressed in their reply (Docket Entry # 115). Defendants shall file a sur-reply addressing Plaintiffs' arguments regarding reconsideration by August 20, 2010. The court will schedule any additional matters upon deciding the two pending motions. Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 8/9/2010. (Lee, Tiffeny)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

-------------------------------------------------------------------)(
CLAUDIA GAYLE, IndividuallY and On Behalf of AI! Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff,

-againstH A R R Y ' S NURSES REGISTRY, INC. and HARRY DORVILIER alk/a HARRY DORVILlEN, Defendants. NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, United States District Judge.

ORDER 07-CV-4672 (NGG) (MDG)

-------------------------------------------------------------------)(

The court held oral argument on August 9, 2010, to address Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment. Defendants reiterated their intention (see Docket Entry # 96) to move for reconsideration of Judge Siftoo's liability findings. Defendants also explained to the court that their opposition to Plaintiffs' summary judgment motion (Docket Entry # 113) fully covered the

arguments that they would make regarding reconsideration. With the consent of the parties, the court converted Defendants' opposition into a motion for reconsideration. Plaintiffs indicated
that their opposition to Defendants' motion for reconsideration is fully addressed in their reply (Docket Entry # 115). Defendants shall file a sur-reply addressing Plaintiffs' arguments regarding reconsideration by August 20, 2010. The court will schedule any additional matters upon deciding the two pending motions.

SO ORDERED.

s/Nicholas G. Garaufis
Dated: Brooklyn, New York

NtCHOLAS G. bAAAUFIS
United States District Judge

August 1,2010