Florez v. United States of America

Filing 24

ORDER denying plaintiff's denying 23 to correct sentence. Ordered by Senior Judge Raymond J. Dearie on 9/7/2011. (Lee, Tiffeny)

Download PDF
FILED INCLERK'SOFfiCE N~ U.S. DISTRICT COURT E.O. · • * ~£P 0 9 ZUll UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOSE D. FLOREZ, ORDER -againstUNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 04-CR-0080 (RJD) 07-CV-4965 (CPS) Respondent. -------------------------------------------------------------)( DEARIE, United States District Judge: Jose D. Florez, a federal prisoner appearing prose, moves for relief pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6). By order dated July 23, 2009, the Court denied petitioner's motion to vacate his federal sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See Florez v. United States, No. 07-CV-4965 (CPS), 2009 WL 2228121 (E.D.N.Y. Jul. 24, 2009), appeal dismissed, Mandate, No. 09-3924-pr (2d Cir. Jan. 28, 2010). "[R]eliefunder Rule 60(b) is available for a previous habeas proceeding only when the Rule 60(b) motion attacks the integrity of the previous habeas proceeding rather than the underlying criminal conviction." Harris v. United States, 367 F.3d 74,77 (2d Cir. 2004); Rodriguez v. Mitchell, 252 F.3d 191 (2d Cir. 2001). Here, despite petitioner's argumentto the contrary, he does challenge the underlying criminal conviction in this Rule 60(b) motion and not the integrity of the § 2255 proceeding. In fact, he seeks to "correct" his sentence to remove "the three point offense level enhancement," Motion at 2, thereby challenging his underlying sentence. The same ground was presented and rejected in his § 2255 motion. See Florez, 2009 WL 2228121 at *21. Accordingly, this motion is denied as beyond the scope of Rule 60(b). Gitten v. United States, 311 F.3d 529, 534 (2d Cir. 2002). Florez may move in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive § 2255 motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255; 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). SO ORDERED. Dated: CJ / r ,2011 Brooii'y~, New York ~~.. BROOKLYN OFFICE -------------------------------------------------------------)( Petitioner, * s/Raymond J. Dearie Rayll'\olij J.~e United State 1strict Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?