Robinson v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al

Filing 75

ORDER: By letter dated 7/28/2010, plaintiff moves for an order to compel defendant to produce certain documents. By letter dated 7/29/2010, counsel for defendant states that the documents at issue were sent to plaintiff's current address. Accord ingly, the Court denies plaintiff's 71 motion to compel. If plaintiff did not receive this delivery, he should contact FedEx and/or defendant's counsel. No hearing is necessary at this time. Therefore, plaintiff's 73 request is denied. Plaintiff must first contact defendant's counsel, not the Court to resolve discovery disputes. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on 8/17/2010) C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------J( JACK ROBINSON, Plaintiff, -againstA. JIMMINEZ, Defendant. ORDER 08 CV 902 (NGG)(LB) -----------------------------------------------------------J( BLOOM, United States Magistrate Judge: By letter dated July 28, 2010, plaintiff moves for an order to compel defendant to produce certain documents. By letter dated July 29,2010, counsel for defendant states that the documents at issue were sent to plaintiff's current address (67 Strawberry Lane, Staten Island, NY 10312). Counsel for defendant includes a "proof-of-delivery" from FedEx Express. Accordingly, the Court denies plaintiff's motion to compel. If plaintiff did not receive this delivery, he should contact FedEx and/or defendant's counsel. No hearing is necessary at this time. Therefore, plaintiff's request is denied. (Docket entry 73). Plaintiff must first contact defendant's counsel, not the Court to resolve discovery disputes. SO ORDERED. /Signed by Judge Bloom/ LOIS BLOOM United States Magistrate Judge Dated: August 17,2010 Brooklyn, New York

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?