Mikhlyn et al v. Bove et al

Filing 193

ORDER dated 3/3/11 re defendant's 191 Objection to Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Reyes. The Court will construe defendants' 2/16/11 submission as a motion for reconsideration directed to Judge Reyes. Counsel for the corporate defendants is directed to serve the individual defendants with this order. ( Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 3/3/2011 ) (Guzzi, Roseann)

Download PDF
Mikhlyn et al v. Bove et al Doc. 193 Case 1:08-cv-03367-ARR -RER Document 11 Filed 09/05/08 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VIRGIN RECORDS AMERICA, INC., a California corporation; MOTOWN RECORD COMPANY, L.P., a California limited partnership; SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, a Delaware general partnership; ARISTA RECORDS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; and BMG MUSIC, a New York general partnership, Plaintiffs, -againstRAJESH RAMHARRACK, aka RAJESH RAMHARRACH, Defendant. x : : : Civil Action No.: 1:06-cv-06671-DGT : : Filed Electronically APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF : DEFAULT JUDGMENT BY THE COURT : : : NOTICE OF MOTION PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, upon the accompanying Memorandum of Law and Declaration of Brian E. Moran, and all prior papers and proceedings herein, the undersigned now moves before the Honorable David G. Trager, United States Judge for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, 225 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, New York 11201, for a order for entry of default judgment and permanent injunction against the defendant, RAJESH RAMHARRACK, aka RAJESH RAMHARRACH. DATED:Stamford, Connecticut March 12, 2008 By: s/Brian E. Moran Brian E. Moran (BM-8573) Victor B. Kao (VK-6967) Robinson & Cole LLP 885 Third Avenue, Suite 2800 New York, NY 10022-4834 Telephone: (212) 451-2900 Fax: (212) 451-2999 Attorneys for Plaintiffs TO: Rajesh Ramharrach 12613 115th Ave, #2 Jamaica, NY 11420 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?