Mikhlyn et al v. Bove et al

Filing 242

First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply on behalf of Pro Se Defendants and Trade Indicator by Ana Bove, Polina Dolginov. (Berger, Jonathan)

September
21,2011
Via ECF
JudgeRamonE. Reyes
United StatesDistrict Court,
Eastern
District of New York
225 CadmanPlazaEast
Brooklyn,NY 11201
Re:

vadim Milcrlyn, et al. v. Ana Bove, et al., Index No. cv 0g 3367

DearJudgeReyes:
We are submitting this letter requestingan extension. We are currently reviewing the
latestdocuments
submittedby Plaintiffs on September19,2011 ("plaintiffs")1DJc. No.
241). As the Court is aware, the Pro Se Defendantsand l'rade lndicator need extra time
to responddue to the langr"rage
issues.
We are requesting extensionto file a reply to Plaintiff s paperson October3,2011 .
an
On Septemb 20, 2071, Trade lndicator provided a letter to Flaintiffs' attomeys
er
explaining the produced additional frade Indicator documents.
We were accused very seriousviolations,we needat leasttwo weeks fbr sood and
of
clear to answer and proof lhat we were right.
Thank you for your consideration.

Respecffu submitted,
lly

/4n EotD'{Kt

TradeindicatorInc (Alex Sakirski)

Cc:

Eric wertheim, DarrielAkselrod,lawyersfor plaintiff(via ECF)
PeterBerger,lawyer for Corporate
Defendants