Mikhlyn et al v. Bove et al

Filing 94

Letter Joint Deposition Schedule by Ana Bove (Kogan, Boris)

Download PDF
Mikhlyn et al v. Bove et al Doc. 94 Case 1:08-cv-03367-CPS-RER Document 94 Filed 11/10/09 Page 1 of 2 BORIS KOGAN & ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW 277 BROADWAY, SUITE 701 NEW YORK, NY 10007 TEL: (212) 625-8910 FAX: (212) 219-2728 WWW.BORISKOGAN.COM EMAIL: BK@BORISKOGAN.COM November 10, 2009 Sent Via ECF To: Honorable Judge Ramon E. Reyes United States District Court Eastern District of New York 225 Cadman Plaza East Brooklyn, NY 11201 Re: Mikhlyn, et al. v. Bove, et al. Case No. 1:08-cv-3367 Honorable Judge Reyes: The parties jointly agree to the following deposition schedule with the understanding that: (a) each side preserves its right under Rule 30 to seek additional days of deposition with respect to any witness if the witness' deposition is not completed in the scheduled time, (b) with respect to the depositions of Vadim and Inga Mikhlyn, plaintiffs will consent to a second day of either or both depositions if defendants request it; and (c) the parties will negotiate any issues about the length and scheduling of depositions in good faith before seeking Court intervention: Monday, November 23, 2009 Tuesday, November 24, 2009 Ana Bove Ana Bove Wednesday, November 25, 2009 - Representative from Accounting and Tax Services Tuesday, December 1, 2009 Monday, December 7, 2009 Inga Mikhlyn Zinaida Bolyachevski Vadim Mikhlyn Alex Sakirski Polina Dolginov (the parties Wednesday, December 9, 2009 Thursday, December 10, 2009 Wednesday, December 16, 2009 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:08-cv-03367-CPS-RER Document 94 Filed 11/10/09 Page 2 of 2 stipulate that this deposition will last beyond the seven hour limit of Rule 30(d) and will continue for half a day on Thursday, December 17, 2009. In the event that more time is needed to complete the deposition thereafter, it shall be done remotely.) Very truly yours, /s/ Boris Kogan Boris Kogan (BK-9135) BK:ya

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?