DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. v. Kontogiannis et al

Filing 172

ORDER denying 170 Motion to Stay. Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 6/3/2009. (Giovannelli, Justin)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------------X : DLJ MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC., : : Plaintiff, : : - against : : THOMAS KONTOGIANNIS, GEORGIA : KONTOGIANNIS, LISA DIPINTO a/k/a LISA : KONTOGIANNIS a/k/a LISA PALLATOS, ANNETTE : APERGIS,CHLOE KONTOGIANNIS, ADAM DIPINTO, : ELIAS APERGIS, JOHN T. MICHAEL, MICHAEL A. : GALLAN, ESQ., TED DOUMAZIOS, ESQ., : THOMAS F. CUSACK, III, ESQ., STEPHEN P. : BROWN, ESQ., STEVEN A. MARTINI, : CARMINE CUOMO, COASTAL CAPITAL : CORPORATION, d/b/a THE MORTGAGE SHOP : d/b/a CLEARLIGHT MORTGAGE, EDGEWATER : DEVELOPMENT, INC., GROUP KAPPA CORP., : LORING ESTATES LLC, PARKVIEW FINANCIAL : CENTER, INC., d/b/a PARKVIEW FINANCIAL, INC., : : CLEAR VIEW ABSTRACT LLC, TRIUMPH ABSTRACT LLC, BOND & WALSH CONSTRUCTION : COMPANY, INTERAMERICAN MORTGAGE CORP., : and PLAZA REAL ESTATE HOLDING INC., : : Defendants. : : -------------------------------------------------------------------------X VITALIANO, D.J. ORDER 1:08-cv-4607-ENV-RML By Memorandum and Order dated today, June 3, 2009, Docket Entry No. 168, the Court denied plaintiff DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc.'s request for a temporary restraining order while its motions for attachment and a preliminary injunction are briefed and decided. While offering no new facts or argument, plaintiff now seeks, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62(c), an order granting the very relief the Court just denied. See Pl.'s Letter Mot. to Stay, Docket Entry No. 170. Plaintiff's remedy, if any, lies with the Court of Appeals. The application for a stay or temporary restraining order is denied. SO ORDERED. Dated: Brooklyn, New York June 3, 2009 s/ENV ERIC N. VITALIANO United States District Judge _ 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?