Colon v. City of New York et al

Filing 165

ORDER ADOPTING 164 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Ordered by Senior Judge Jack B. Weinstein, on 2/28/2012. (Barrett, C)

Download PDF
FiLED u.s. IN CLERK'S OFFICE OISTRI<::T COURT E.O.N.Y. * FEB 2820\2 * UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ORDER BROOKLYN OFFICE JOSE COLON, Plaintiff, 09-CV-8 - againstTHE CITY OF NEW YORK, et aI., Defendants. MAXIMO COLON, Plaintiff, 09-CV-9 - againstTHE CITY OF NEW YORK, et aI., Defendants. JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior United States District Judge: Upon referral from the court, the magistrate judge recommended on February 9, 2012 that: defendants Henry Tavarez and Steven Anderson be held jointly and severally liable to plaintiffs as follows: (I) plaintiff Jose Colon to be awarded $213,393.95, representing $13\ ,708.95 in lost wages, $50,000 in emotional distress damages, $31,185.00 in attorney's fees, and $500.00 in costs; and (2) plaintiff Maximo Colon to be awarded $218,943.95, representing $131,708.95 in lost wages, $65,000 in emotional distress damages, $21,735.00 in attorney's fees, and $500.00 in costs. Report and Recommendation 47, Colon v. City of New York et aI., No. 09-CV-08 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 9, 2012), CMJECF No. 172 (footnote omitted). The magistrate judge also stated that: I Any objections to this Report and Recommendation must be. filed with the Clerk of the Court, with a copy to the undersigned, within fourteen (14) days of receipt of this Report. Failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(I); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), neb); Small v. Sec'y of HeaIth and Human Servs., 892 F.2d 15, 16 (2d Cir. 1989). Id. No objection having been taken, the Report and Recommendation is adopted. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment as indicated above. o ORDERED. Senior United States District Judge Dated: February 28,2012 Brooklyn, New York 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?