Misu v. United States District Court State of et al

Filing 9

ORDER: To the extent that Plaintiff's submissions received on March 31 and April 8 are construed as motions, they are denied. Plaintiff's submissions in the past month have convinced the court that a bar order is the only route to staving off the flow of frivolous filings by this litigant. Accordingly, the court orders that: (1) Plaintiff is enjoined from filing any new in forma pauperis action in this court without obtaining leave of court; (2) the Clerk of Court is directed to retu rn to Plaintiff, without filing, any in forma pauperis action which is received from Plaintiff without an application seeking leave to file; (3) if the court grants Plaintiff leave to file a new action, the civil action shall be filed and assigned a civil docket number; (4) if leave to file is denied, Plaintiff's submission shall be filed on the court's miscellaneous docket. 28 U.S.C. § 1651. Nothing herein shall be construed to prohibit Plaintiff from filing an appeal of this Or der; however, the court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).Ordered by Nicholas G. Garaufis on 4/15/2009. (c/m to pro se, copy fwd'd to pro se writ clerks) (Lee, Tiffeny)