Chow et al v. City of New York et al
Filing 37
ORDER, Pltffs' letter 36 is deemed to constitute a motion for a determination that their former attorney has no lien on the settlement proceeds resulting from this action, an issue over which the Court may have supplemental jurisdiction. Pltff s cannot obtain this relief without mailing a copy of their letter and its attachments to their former attorney and filing an affidavit stating that they have done so. The motion is referred to Magistrate Judge Mann for such action as she deems appro priate, including, if necessary, rendering a report and recommendation. To the extent pltffs are seeking any other relief against their former attorney, they may not do so in the context of this action, but must commence a separate action for that relief in a court of appropriate jurisdiction. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to pltff pro se. (Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 1/14/2010) c/m (Galeano, Sonia)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
