Kostovski v. The City of New York et al

Filing 8

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated in this Memorandum and Order, defendant PSCH did not timely remove the case to this Court. Therefore, by June 25, 2009, the parties shall file a stipulation remanding the case to state court or plaintiff shall notify the Court, in writing, that it will file a timely motion to remand or that it consents to have the case remain in federal court. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann on 6/22/2009. (Maynard, Pat)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x OLGA KOSTOVSKI, et al., Plaintiffs, -againstTHE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants. ---------------------------------------------------------------x ROANNE L. MANN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: In response to this Court's Order of June 8, 2009, questioning the timeliness of defendant PSCH Inc.'s Notice of Removal, defendant PSCH filed an Amended Notice of Removal in which it asserted that it "was granted an extension of time to answer until June 12, 2009 by stipulation[,]" and that therefore "removal is timely." Amended Notice of Removal ¶ 3. However, the law is clear that "[t]he extension of time to answer a state court action does not extend time for removal under a federal statute." Silvester + Tafuro, Inc. v. Daniel Cline & Assocs., Inc., No. 03 Civ. 9954 (CSH), 2004 WL 345516, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2004) (citing Reliance Ins. Co. v. Van Liew Cap., Inc., No. 00 Civ. 0471 (NRB), 2000 WL 224104, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 28, 2000), and Bertrand v. Vingan, 899 F.Supp. 1198, 1199 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)); see Nicola Prods. Corp. v. Showart Kitchens, Inc., 682 F.Supp. 171, 173-74 (E.D.N.Y. 1988). Accordingly, defendant PSCH did not timely remove the case to this Court. Therefore, by June 25, 2009, the parties shall file a stipulation remanding the case to state court or MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 09-CV-2382 (ENV) plaintiff shall notify the Court, in writing, that it will file a timely motion to remand or that it consents to have the case remain in federal court. SO ORDERED. Dated: Brooklyn, New York June 22, 2009 ROANNE L. MANN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?