Ahmad v. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey et al

Filing 42

ORDER: This Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. The motion for summary judgment by the Defendants is DENIED as to the excessive force claim against Officer Buckner. The motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to all other claims. Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 1/23/2012. (Brucella, Michelle)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

---------------------------------------------------------J(
MUHAMMID AHMAD,

ORDER

Plaintiff,
09-CV -3134(WFK)(LB)
-againstTHE PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK
AND NEW JERSEY, PORT AUTHORITY
POLICE OFFICER BERNARD BUCKNER,
and PORT AUTHORITY POLICE OFFICER
THOMAS KOSTER,
Defendants.

----------------------------------------------------------J(
This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lois
Bloom, dated December 7, 2012, addressing the motion for summary judgment by Defendants
The Port Authority of New York ("Port Authority"), Port Authority Police Officer Bernard
Buckner ("Officer Buckner"), and Port Authority Police Officer Thomas Koster ("Officer
Koster") (collectively the "Defendants"). No objections have been filed. This Court hereby
adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.
The motion for summary judgment by the Defendants is DENIED as to the excessive
force claim against Officer Buckner. The motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to all
other claims.
SO ORDERED
Dated: Brooklyn, New York
January 23,2012

s/WFK
HON. WILLIAM F.