Brown v. Starrett City Associates et al

Filing 99

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as to 81 Motion for Attorney Fees. Clerk issue judgment. Close the case. Ordered by Senior Judge Jack B. Weinstein, on 1/6/2012. (Barrett, C)

Download PDF
FilEU IN CLERK'S OFFICE U.S . DISTRICT COURT E.D.N. Y. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK * ORDER ANNETTE BROWN, Plaintiff, JAN 0 9 2012 BROOKLYN OFFICE 09-CV-3282 - against STARRETT CITY ASSOCIATES, OFFICER NEWMAN, and JOHN DOES 1-5, ) Defendants. JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior United States District Judge: Defendant Starrett City Associates objects to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation on plaintiff's attorney's fees, arguing that the $80,610.00 in attorney's fees and $8,619.21 in expenses recommended was unreasonable in light of the $500 in compensation awarded to the plaintiff by the jury. A hearing on these objections was held on December 20, 2012. The magistrate judge' s report and recommendation is thorough and perceptive. The hourly rate claimed by plaintiffs attorney in this case was modest, and the time spent on the case necessary. The case required extensive briefing on several complicated issues, including the application of vicarious and municipal liability to the defendant. Although plaintiff withdrew some of her claims, all claims relied on the same facts elicited on the sole claim where the jury found liability. , * The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted. Defendant's arguments for a reduction in the fee have no application in this case. SO ORDERED. ck B. Weinst . enior United States District Judge Date: January 6, 2012 Brooklyn, New York ~~/<.~~ ~7k.~ 9W~ {/t /; 7--

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?