Telebrands Corp. v. HM Import USA Corp.

Filing 53

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated in this Memorandum and Order, the Court declines to disturb its ruling of March 3rd. Again, any request for an order of attachment should be addressed to the District Court. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann on 3/5/2010. (Maynard, Pat)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------x TELEBRANDS CORP., Plaintiff, -againstHM IMPORT USA CORP., et al., Defendants. ------------------------------------------------------------x ROANNE L. MANN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Even after the Court issued its Memorandum and Order on March 3, 2010, D.E. #48, denying plaintiff's request for a compulsion order, the parties continued to file papers as if the Court had not yet ruled on the matter. See Letter in Response to Defendants' Opposition ("Pl. 3/3/10 Letter"), D.E. #49; [Defendants'] Reply in Opposition, D.E. #50; Affidavit/Declaration [sic] in Opposition re Motion to Compel Discovery, D.E. #51. Henceforth, counsel should check their ECF bounces before making their submissions. Treating plaintiff's latest submission as a motion for reconsideration, the Court declines to disturb its ruling of March 3rd. Plaintiff's unadorned assertion "that Defendants intend to render themselves judgment proof and to flee the country," Pl. 3/3/10 Letter at 2, does not warrant an order compelling the post-judgment discovery that plaintiff seeks. Again, any request for an order of attachment should be addressed to the District Court. SO ORDERED. Dated: Brooklyn, New York March 5, 2010 ROANNE L. MANN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 09-CV-3492 (ENV)