John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) v. Posner et al

Filing 18

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE: The parties hereby agree that the above-captioned action is dismissed and discontinued without prejudice only as to defendant Levi Goldstein, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(11) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 10/4/2011. (Fernandez, Erica)

Download PDF
Case 1:10-cv-01477-RRM-CLP Document 16 Filed 10/03/11 Page 1 of 3 PageiD #: 95 UNITE;[) STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---~--------------~--~------------------------------------------: THE JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (U.S.A.), Plaintiff, -against- Docket No.: 10-cv-14n (RRM)(CLP) MARK POSNER and SAMUEL STEIN, In their capacities as Trustees of The Hermine Stein Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust, and LEVI GOLDSTEIN, Defendants. ----··--------------~----------------...--------------------: STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE WHERE AS, on or about April 2, 201 0, plaintiff the John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) ("Plaintiff'), filed a Complaint wherein It sought a declaratory judgment and damages against the defendants; and WHEREAS, without admitting or acknowledging the validity of any claims or defenses asserted by any ofthe parties, Plaintiff and defendant Levi Goldstein are ir~terested in resolving the issues alleged in the Complaint in this action, and have negotiated in good faith for that purpose; and WHEREAS, none of the parties to the above-captioned action is an infant or ir~competent persor~; and WHEREAS, the Plaintiff wishes to discontinue all of Its claims against defendant Levi Goldstein. NOW THEREFORE, in exchange for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties and their respective counsel stipulate as follows: Case 1:10-cv-01477-RRM-CLP Document 16 Filed 10/03/11 1. Page 2 of 3 PageiD #.· 96 The parties hereby agree that the above-captioned action is dismissed and discontinued without prejudice only as to defendant Levi Goldstein, pursuant to Rule 41 (a}(1 )(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2, This Stipulation and any Order entered thereon shall have no precedential value or effect whatsoever and shall not be admissible in any other action or proceeding as evidence or for any other purpose except in an action or proceeding to enforce this Stipulation. Dated: Brooklyn, New York October 3, 2011 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP Attorneys for Pfaintiff The John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) SCHINDEL, FARMAN, LIPSIUS, GARDNER & RABINOVICH LLP Attorneys for Defendants Mark Posner and Samuel Stein 8~~~=-~~~-------­ David Benhaim, Esq. 14 Penn Plaza, Suite 500 New York, New York 10122 TREFF & LOWY PLLC Attorneys for Defendant Levi Goldstein By: ~~~~~~-------­ Mlc ael Paneth, Esq. 342 Bedford Avenue Brooklyn, New York 11249 SO ORDERED: Hon. 2 Case 1:10-cv-01477-RRM-CLP 1. Document 16 Filed 10/03/11 Page 3 of 3 PageiD # 97 The parties hereby agree that the above-captioned action is dismissed and discontinued without prejudice only as to defendant Levi Goldstein, pursuant to Rule 41 (a)(1 )(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2. This Stipulation and any Order entered thereon shall have no precedential value or effect whatsoever and shall not be admissible In any other action or proceeding as evidence or for any other purpose except in an action or proceeding to enforce this Stipulation. Dated: Brooklyn, New York October 3, 2011 SCHINDEL, FARMAN, UPSJUS, GARDNER & RABINOVICH LLP Attorneys for Defendants Mark Posner and Samuef BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff The John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) ~--- By: ____~~--~----------Motty Shulman, Esq. 333 Main Street Armonk, New York 1 0504 TREFF & LOWY PLLC Attorneys for Defendant Levi Goldstein By:~~~~~~------­ Michael Paneth, Esq. 342 Bedford Avenue Brooklyn, New York 11249 SO ORDERED: s/RRM /-~- Han. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?