Yu et al v. Town of Southold et al

Filing 81

ORDER finding as moot 79 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. ; finding as moot 79 Motion to Disqualify Counsel. ; granting 79 Motion to Adjourn Conference: The plaintiff's application to be relieved as counsel is denied as moot. The pl aintiff is directed to file a list of trial witnesses and trial exhibits by November 6, 2012. The defendant shall file a pretrial order pursuant to Judge Seybert's rules, except that the filing will not be joint. The final conference is rescheduled to November 13, 2012 at 11:00 a.m. by telephone. See Order for further details. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge E. Thomas Boyle on 10/16/2012. (Suarez, Stephanie)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------------X HUI HUI YU, CHENG KAI YU, and CHENG KAI YU REVOCABLE TRUST, Plaintiffs, -against- ORDER CV 10-2943 (JS)(ETB) TOWN OF SOUTHOLD IN SUFFOLK COUNTY NEW YORK, SCOTT A. RUSSELL (Chief Executive), SOUTHOLD TOWN JUSTICE COURT, WILLIAM H. PRICE, Jr. (Chief Justice), RUDOLPH H. BRUER (Justice), the OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY, MARTIN FINNEGAN, Esq. (Town Attorney), LORI HULSE [MONTEFUSCO], Esq. (Assistant Town Attorney), the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES, JILL M. DOHERTY (President, Trustee), JAMES KING (President, Trustee), the SOUTHOLD TOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT, CARLISLE COCHRAN (Chief), FRANK KRUSZESKI (Lieutenant), DONALD DZENKOWSKI (Bay Constable), ANDREW C. EPPLE, Jr. (Bay Constable), DAVID M. OKULA (Police), SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD, SOUTHOLD TOWN TAX RECEIVER and ASSESSORS, JOHN DOEs and JANE DOEs, individually and in their official capacities, Defendants. -------------------------------------------------------------------------X The plaintiff’s application dated October 5, 2012 to be relieved as counsel is denied as moot since the sole remaining issue in this action is an excessive force claim in which the plaintiff, reportedly a licensed attorney in New York, is the sole claimant. Thus, in the absence of new counsel, plaintiff must represent herself. The plaintiff is directed to file a list of trial witnesses and trial exhibits on or before November 6, 2012. The defendant shall file a pre-trial order pursuant to Judge Seybert’s rules, except that the filing will not be joint. The plaintiff’s failure to comply with this Order will expose the plaintiff’s sole remaining cause of action to sanctions, including preclusion and dismissal. The fact that plaintiff has not retained counsel to represent her on this sole remaining cause of action will not be considered as justification for non-compliance. The final conference is re-scheduled to November 13, 2012 at 11:00 a.m. with E. Thomas Boyle, United States Magistrate Judge. Defendant’s counsel is directed to initiate the conference call and have all parties on the line before connecting the court (631-712-5710). The call must be placed through the teleconference operator provided by your long-distance service. All counsel must participate. No request for adjournment will be considered unless made at least forty-eight (48) hours before the scheduled conference. All requests should be in writing, on consent of all parties, and contain at least two (2) adjourned dates on which all parties are available. In the absence of consent, an explanation of counsel’s efforts to obtain agreement should be stated. All requests for adjournments should be sent to chambers via ECF on notice to all parties. SO ORDERED: Dated: Central Islip, New York October 16, 2012 /s/ E. Thomas Boyle E. THOMAS BOYLE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?