De Alvarez et al v. The City of New York et al
Filing
32
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. See attached. Ordered by Senior Judge Sterling Johnson, Jr on 6/8/2012. (Figeroux, Davina)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------------------------------X
IRLANDA ALVAREZ,
Plaintiff,
10 CV 4434 (SJ) (LB)
-against-
ORDER ADOPTING
REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.,
Defendants.
-------------------------------------------------------X
APPEARANCES
SAMUEL SHAW
30 West 95th Street
1st Floor
New York, NY 10025
Attorney for Plaintiff
New York City Law Department
100 Church Street
New York, NY 10007
By: Andrew James Rauschberg
JOHNSON, Senior District Judge:
Presently before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (“Report”)
prepared by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom. Judge Bloom issued the Report on May
16, 2012, and provided the parties with the requisite amount of time to file any
objections. Neither party filed any objections to the Report. For the reasons stated
herein, this Court affirms and adopts the Report in its entirety.
1
A district court judge may designate a magistrate judge to hear and
determine certain motions pending before the Court and to submit to the Court
proposed findings of fact and a recommendation as to the disposition of the motion.
See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within 10 days of service of the recommendation, any
party may file written objections to the magistrate’s report. See id. Upon de novo
review of those portions of the record to which objections were made, the district
court judge may affirm or reject the recommendations. See id.
The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard,
the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the
report and recommendation to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v.
Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). In addition, failure to file timely objections may
waive the right to appeal this Court=s Order. See 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1); Small v.
Sec=y of Health and Human Servs., 892 F.2d 15, 16 (2d Cir. 1989).
In this case, objections to Magistrate Judge Bloom=s recommendations were
due on June 4, 2012. No objections to the Report were filed with this Court. Upon
review of the recommendations, this Court adopts and affirms Magistrate Judge
Bloom=s Report in its entirety.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 8, 2012
Brooklyn, NY
____________/s/___________________
Sterling Johnson, Jr., U.S.D.J.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?