Ma'at El v. Vesid Organization and Affiliates et al
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER: On 1/20/2011, plaintiff submitted an 4 amended complaint. Since the amended complaint does not provide information to allow the Court to conclude that plaintiff has exhausted his administrative remedies, the action is dismissed without prejudice. Should plaintiff exhaust his state review and obtain a final decision by the VESID due process hearing officer, he may bring a new action in this Court or in state court for review of the final decision. T he Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan, on 1/27/2011) C/mailed by Chambers. (Forwarded for Judgment) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
