Ortho Sleep Products, LLC v. Dreamy Mattress Corp. et al

Filing 26

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The plaintiffs motion for default judgment is granted. Judgment shall enter against defendants in the amount of $169,956.93, broken down as follows: (1) $94,380.57 in enhanced damages pursuant to 15 U.S.C § 1117(a); (2) $49,595.50 for breach of contract and goods sold and delivered; (3) $24,401.25 in attorneys' fees; and (4) $1,579.61 in costs. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. Ordered by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 12/17/2012. (fwd for judgment) (Fernandez, Erica)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------)( ORTHO SLEEP PRODUCTS, LLC, NOT FOR PUBLICATION MEMORANDUM & ORDER 11-CV-6049 (CBA) (CLP) Plaintiff, -againstDREAMY MATTRESS CORP., DREAMY'S BEDDING, INC., DREAMY'S FURNITURE CORP., a/k/a DREAMY'S MATTRESS, SAMEEH ABUDA YEH, MOHAMED ABUDA YEH, and GHANDI ABUDA YEH, FILED IN CLEAK'8 OFFICE U.S. DISTRICT COURT S.D.N.Y. * DEC 17 2012 * BROOKLYN OFFICE Defendants. ---------------------------------------------------------)( AMON, Chief United States District Judge. Plaintiff Ortho Sleep Products brings this action against defendants Dreamy's Mattress Corp., Dreamy's Bedding, Inc., Dreamy's Furniture Corp., a/k/a Dreamy's Mattress (collectively "corporate defendants"), Sameeh Abudayeh, Mohamed Abudayeh, and Ghandi Abudayeh (collectively "individual defendants"). Plaintiff alleges that the corporate defendants failed to pay invoices as they came due and that the corporate and individual defendants engaged in unfair competition in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125. The defendants failed to appear or otherwise defend this action, and upon plaintiffs application, the Clerk of the Court entered default against defendants on December 2, 2011. (DE 6.) Plaintiff filed the instant motion for default judgment on March 7, 2012 (DE 7), which this Court referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak for report and recommendation. Pending before the Court is Magistrate Judge Pollak's Report and Recommendation (the "R&R") issued on August 29,2012. (DE 19.) "A district judge may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge." Wilson v. Dalene, 699 F. Supp. 2d 534, 540 (E.D.N.Y. 2010). Where, as here, no timely objection has been made to the R&R, the "court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face ofthe record" to accept a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation. Wilds v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 262 F. Supp. 2d 163, 169 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) (internal quotation marks omitted). Having reviewed the record and so satisfied itself, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Pollak's thoroughly reasoned R&R as the opinion of this Court. The plaintiffs motion for default judgment is granted. Judgment shall enter against defendants in the amount of $169,956.93, broken down as follows: (1) $94,380.57 in enhanced damages pursuant to 15 U.S.C § 1117(a); (2) $49,595.50 for breach of contract and goods sold and delivered; (3) $24,401.25 in attorneys' fees; and (4) $1,579.61 in costs. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: Brooklyn, N.Y. s/Carol Bagley Amon ~ '7,2012 Carol Bagley Chief United 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?