Griffin v. Santander Bank et al
Filing
66
ORDER denying 65 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. CM to pro se plaintiff. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 4/28/2014. (Florio, Lisa)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------.---------------------------------------------X
TRAVIS D. GRIFFIN,
Plaintiff,
-against-
ORDER
12-CV-1249 (SJF)
SANTANDER BANK eta!., SANTANDER
CONSUMER, USA et a!.,
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
FEUERSTEIN, District Judge.
FILED
IN CLERK'S OFFICE
U S DISTRICT COURT E D NY
*
APR 2 8 2014
*
LONG ISLAND OFFICE
On March 14,2012, plaintiff Travis D. Griffm ("plaintiff') commenced this action
alleging civil rights violations pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยงยง 1981 and 1982. Plaintiff has appeared
prose since this case was filed, but never sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis. On January
16, 2014, the Court adopted the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge E. Thomas
Boyle and granted defendants' motion for summary judgment. DE 61. Final judgment was on
entered on January 28, 2014 and the case was closed.
Plaintiff timely filed a Notice of Appeal of the judgment on February 28, 2014, at which
time he also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. For the following reasons,
plaintiffs motion is denied.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(1), a party who did not proceed in
forma pauperis in the district court, but who wishes to so proceed on appeal, must file a motion
with the district court and attach an affidavit that: "(A) shows in the detail prescribed by Form 4
of the Appendix of Forms the party's inability to pay or to give security for fees and costs; (B)
claims an entitlement to redress; and (C) states the issues that the party intends to present on
appeal."
The affidavit attached to plaintiff's motion states "I believe I am entitled to redress" (DE
65 pp. 3 & 21) and contains a detailed explanation of plaintiff's financial situation. Plaintiff's
affidavit also includes a page entitled: "Issues plaintiff-appellant intends to present on appeal."
Id at p. I 7. This section discusses the standards for Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)
and 56(a) motions and the standards applied in adopting a magistrate judge's report and
recommendation. It does not, however, delineate the issues to be raised on appeal. For that
reason, plaintiff's motion for in forma pauperis status on appeal must be and hereby is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 28, 2014
Central Islip, New York
s/ Sandra J. Feuerstein
Sandra J. Feuerstein, U.S.D.J.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?