Payne et al v. Golden First Mortgage Corp. et al
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: On July 1, 2013, the Honorable Marilyn D. Go issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R) recommending that this Court dismiss the instant action with prejudice for failure to prosecute and compl y with Court orders. The parties were given until July 18, 2013 to file objections to the R&R. No objections have been filed to date. Reviewing the R&R for clear error, the Court hereby adopts Magistrate Go's R&R as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this order and close this case. Ordered by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 7/23/2013. (fwd for judgment) (Fernandez, Erica) Modified on 7/24/2013 (Fernandez, Erica). c/m
. FILED
IN CLERK'S OFI"IC!
U.S. DISTRICT COURT E.O.N.Y.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------)(
*
JUL 2 4 2013
*
BROOKLYN OFFICE
Cynthia Payne and Gregory R. Williams,
Plaintiffs,
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
12-cv-2673 (CBA) (MDG)
-againstGolden First Mortgage Corp., et al.
Defendants.
---------------------------------------------------------)(
AMON, Chief United States District Judge.
On July I, 2013, the Honorable Marilyn D. Go issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R)
recommending that this Court dismiss the instant action with prejudice for failure to prosecute
and comply with Court orders. The parties were given until July 18, 2013 to file objections to
the R&R. No objections have been filed to date. Reviewing the R&R for clear error, the Court
hereby adopts Magistrate Go's R&R as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk of Court is directed
to enter judgment in accordance with this order and close this case.
SO ORDERED.
Jd
Dated: July
2013
Brooklyn, N.Y.
s/Carol Bagley Amon
Carol Bagley
Chief United S
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?