Rogers v. NYPD (New York City Police Department) et al

Filing 17

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: On June 4, 2013, the Honorable Marilyn D. Go issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R) recommending that this Court dismiss the instant action with prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties were given until June 21, 2013 to file objections to the R&R. No objections have been filed to date. Reviewing the R&R for clear error, the Court hereby adopts Magistrate Go's R& R as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this order and closethis case. Ordered by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 7/23/2013. (fwd for judgment) (Fernandez, Erica) Modified on 7/24/2013 (Fernandez, Erica). c/m

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------)( Ervin B. Rogers, Plaintiff, NOT FOR PUBLICATION MEMORANDUM & ORDER 12-cv-3042 (CBA) (MDG) -againstPolice Officer Jose Villafane, FILED Defendant. ---------------------------------------------------------)( AMON, Chief United States District Judge. us~=OFFICE Y. . . 0URT E.O.N. * JUl 2 4 2013 * BROOKLYN OFFICE On June 4, 2013, the Honorable Marilyn D. Go issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R) recommending that this Court dismiss the instant action with prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties were given until June 21, 2013 to file objections to the R&R. No objections have been filed to date. Reviewing the R&R for clear error, the Court hereby adopts Magistrate Go's R&R as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this order and close this case. SO ORDERED. V, 2013 Dated: July Brooklyn, N.Y. s/Carol Bagley Amon Carol Bag]~f~IJ Chief United Sta es District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?