McClenan v. Cangiarella et al
Filing
5
ORDER: The Complaint is accordingly DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the case. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 11/27/2012. (c/m to pro se; fwd'd for jgm) (Lee, Tiffeny)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------------)(
ROSCOE McCLENAN,
ORDER
Plaintiff,
12-CV-04909 (NGG) (LB)
-against-
DI CANGIARELLA, CAPT. JAMES COAN, LT.
DANIEL DAVIN, SGT. DONALD MORGAN,
CHIEF ANTHONY IZZO, and INSPECTOR
DIRUSSO,
Defendants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------)(
NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, United States District Judge.
On September 26, 2012, Plaintiff Roscoe McClenan filed this action pro se against six
New York City Police Department employees alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964,42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (See Compi. (Dkt. 1).) On October 19,2012, the court
dismissed Plaintiffs Complaint and denied his request to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP")
without prejudice with leave to re-file both documents within thirty days. (Oct. 19, 2012, Mem.
& Order (Dkt. 4).) The court warned Plaintiff that "[i]n the event that Plaintiff does not file
either an amended IFP application or an amended complaint within this period, the Clerk of
Court [will be] directed to close the case." (Id. at 2-3.)
Plaintiff has failed to file either an amended IFP application or an amended complaint as
instructed, and the time to do so has passed. The Complaint is accordingly DISMISSED with
prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the case. For purposes of any
appeal, the court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any request to proceed IFP
would not be taken in good faith.
SO ORDERED.
s/Nicholas G. Garaufis
NicHOLAS G. GARAUtIS
United States District Judge
Dated: Brooklyn, New York
November~, 2012
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?