Bitton v. Chitrid et al
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Plaintiff Danielle Bitton requests an order to show cause for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order seeking, inter alia, to prevent defendants from "funding of crimes against humanity from the Bank of Israel to the Bank of England," and the "immediately release [of Bitton's] family from illegal detention/concentration camp/to give back our identities that FBI... illegally stole.... " Bitton has neither demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits nor made a showing of immediate or irreparable harm. Accordingly, her #4 request for an order to show cause is denied. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon, on 11/6/2012. C/mailed to pro se Plaintiff. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
FILID
IN eLeRl('S O/'PICI
U.S. OISTRICT COURT E.O.N.V.
*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
______________________________________________________ ------------x
NOV0620f2
*
BROOKLYN OFFICE
DANIELLE BITTON,
NOT FOR PRINT OR
ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
12-CV-05359 (CBA) (LB)
Plaintiff,
- againstSIMON CHITRID, et aI.,
Defendants.
--------------------------------------------------------------------x
AMON, Chief United States District Judge.
Plaintiff Danielle Bitton, appearing pro se, commenced this action on October 24,2012, alleging,
inter alia, that "my family's identities have been illegally used by both foreign & domestic Governments
on how to sabotage and violate our identities, and our human rights." (DE #1.) She requests an order to
show cause for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order seeking, inter alia, to prevent
defendants from "funding of crimes against humanity from the Bank of Israel to the Bank of England,"
and the "immediately release [of Bitton's] family from illegal detention/concentration camp/to give back
our identities that FBI ... illegally stole .... " (DE #4.)
"A preliminary injunction is an extraordinary remedy never awarded as of right." Winter v.
Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008). "A plaintiff seeking a preliminary injunction must
establish that he is likely to succeed on the merits, that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the
absence of preliminary relief, that the balance of equities tips in his favor, and that an injunction is in the
public interest." Id. at 20. Bitton has neither demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits nor made
a showing of immediate or irreparable harm. Accordingly, her request for an order to show cause is
denied.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: Brooklyn, New York
November /p , 2012
/S/ Chief Judge Amon
Carol Bagley
Chief United
Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?