Deac v. IL Postino, Inc. et al

Filing 73

ORDER re 72 Response in Opposition to Motion filed by Ovidium Marcel Deac: Plaintiff is cautioned that his submission does not satisfy his obligations under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, Local Civil Rule 56.1, or this Court's orders. The Court once again directs plaintiff to respond to defendant's motion for summary judgment, by June 30, 2014, in a form complying with these rules and orders. See attached Order for details. C/mailed via Federal Express [Tracking No. 8019-9071-5643] to Ovidiu Marcel Deac, pro se plaintiff. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann on 6/17/2014. (Bauermeister, Mischa)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------x
OVIDIU MARCEL DEAC,
Plaintiff,
-against-

ORDER
12-CV-5952 (NGG)

IL POSTINO, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
------------------------------------------------------------x
ROANNE L. MANN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE:
In light of defendants’ failure to comply with Local Civil Rule 56.2 when serving and
filing their motion for summary judgment, this Court provided pro se plaintiff Ovidiu Marcel
Deac, on June 6, 2014, with the notice required by that rule. See Order (June 6, 2014)
(“6/6/14 Order”), Electronic Case Filing Docket Entry (“DE”) #69; Defendants’ Letter (June
10, 2014), DE #70. Additionally, this Court directed plaintiff to file a new response to
defendants’ summary judgment motion by June 30, 2014. See 6/6/14 Order at 2; Order (June
11, 2014) (“6/11/14 Order”), DE #71. The Court explicitly directed plaintiff to comply with
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and Local Civil Rule 56.1 in preparing his response. See
6/11/14 Order.
On June 13, 2014, this Court received a document from plaintiff titled “Plaintiff’s
Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.” See Plaintiff’s Response to
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (June 13, 2014), DE #72. Plaintiff is hereby
cautioned that this submission does not satisfy his obligations under Federal Rule 56, Local
Rule 56.1, or this Court’s orders. The Court once again directs plaintiff to respond to

defendants’ motion for summary judgment, by June 30, 2014, in a form complying with the
aforementioned rules and orders.

SO ORDERED.
Dated:

Brooklyn, New York
June 16, 2014

Roanne L. Mann

/s/
ROANNE L. MANN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

-2-