Shehabeldin v. NYC Police Department et al

Filing 12

ORDER [ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION]: This Court has received Magistrate Judge Gold's 7 Report and Recommendation ("R&R") issued 2/5/2013, recommending that the N.Y.P.D. be dismissed from this action because the N.Y.P.D. is not a proper defendant. Plaintiff has accordingly obtained 11 leave to file an amended complaint directing her claims against the City of New York. The Court finds no error in Judge Gold's R&R and adopts it as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this order. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon, on 2/27/2013. C/mailed to pro se Plaintiff. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

Download PDF
~;U.. L:.l) IN CLERK'S OFFICE U.S DlSTRIGT C0lJRT E.D.NY * FEB 2 7 2013 * UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BROOKLYN OFFICE ---------------------------------------------------------J( NOHA SHEHABELDIN, Plaintiff, -against- NOT FOR PUBLICATION ORDER 13-CV-138 (CBA) (SMG) N.Y.P.D., et aI., Defendants. ---------------------------------------------------------J( AMON, Chief United States District Judge. This Court has received Magistrate Judge Gold's report and recommendation ("R&R") issued February 5, 2013, recommending that the N.Y.P.D. be dismissed from this action because the N.Y.P.D. is not a proper defendant. No party has objected; in fact, plaintiff has agreed to dismiss the N.Y.P.D. as a defendant. (DE 8, 10.) Plaintiff has accordingly obtained leave to file an amended complaint directing her claims against the City of New York. (DE 11.) The Court finds no error in Judge Gold's R&R and adopts it as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this order. SO ORDERED. Dated: Brooklyn, N.Y. f~. 27 ,2013 /S/ Chief Judge Carol B. Amon Carol Bagley knon ( / J Chief United States ~trict Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?