Dukes v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation et al
Filing
12
STIPULATION AND ORDER granting 11 Motion to Consolidate Cases. Ordered by Judge I. Leo Glasser on 4/17/2013. (Marziliano, August)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-··----··-------·----·--·····---·-·--···---· X
MARLON NURSE,
Plaintiff,
-againstNEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS
CORPORATION, JACQUELINE PURSER, and JEFF
EGERTON (sued herein as Jeffrey Egerton) as alders
and abettors,
STIPULATION
CONSOLIDATING CASES
13 CV 115 (WFK)(SMG)
Defendants,
- ......... - ...------.....................- -....- -....- - -.........................~-x
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
·····-•····--·-"·················-----·-------•----·--···· X
DEASIA DUKES,
· Plaintiff,
-againstNEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS
CORPORATION, JACQUELINE PURSER, and JEFF
EGERTON (sued herein as Jeffrey Egerton) as alders
and abettors,
STIPULATION
CONSOLIDATING CASES
13 CV 207 (ILG)(RML)
Defendants.
------ ------'""-"'-="·--------- - --- =--=--===--=====
WHEREAS, plaintiffMarlon Nurse filed a complaint with the Clerk of this Court
on January 8, 2013, Docket No. 13 CV 115, naming the ''New York City Health and Hospitals
Corporation, Jacqueline Purser, and Jeff Egerton '(sued herein as Jeffrey Egerton), as alders and
abettors," as defendants (the "Nurse action"); and
WHEREAS, plaintiff Marlon Nurse alleges causes of action against defendants
under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and New York State and City Human Rights Laws; and
WHEREAS, plaintiffDeasia Dukes filed a complaint with the Clerk of this Court
on J~nuary 12, 2013, Docket No. 13 CV 207, naming the "New York City Health and Hospitals
Corporation, Jacqueline Purser and Jeff Egerton (sued herein as Jeffrey Egerton}, as alders and
abettors," as defendants and these are the same defendants in the Nurse action; and
WHEREAS, plaintiff Deasia Dukes alleges claims against defendants under Title
VII, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and New York State and City Human Rights Laws and these are the same
statutes as in the Nli!:R action; and
WHEREAS, the fact allegations in Civil Action Nos. 13 CV 115 and 13 CV 207
are based on the same alleged acts and omissions by defendants; and
WHEREAS, discovery in Civil Action Nos. 13 CV 115 and 13 CV 207 will
involve the same or substantially similar matters; and
WHEREAS, both Civil Action Nos. 13 CV 115 and 13 CV 207 involve common
questions of law and fact; and
WHEREAS, a substantial savings of judicial and attorney resources are likely to
result from consolidating Civil Action Nos. 13 CV 115 and 13 CV 207; and
WHEREAS, the parties agree that these actions should be consolidated for any
and all purposes from the date ofthis Stipulation; NOW, THEREFORE,
~----------ITLLI&J:StJBEtl.ll
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?