Lautman v. 2800 Coyle St. Owners Corp. et al

Filing 64

OPINION & ORDER: I have reviewed plaintiff's objections to Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky's 57 Order of 6/25/2014, which was made on the record. Neither Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky's denial of plaintiff's request that the magistrate recuse himself from plaintiff's case nor Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky's setting of a discovery schedule against plaintiff's wishes after plaintiff asked to be excused was "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Accordingly, plaintiff's request that the orders be set aside is denied. SO ORDERED by Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 7/22/2014. C/mailed by Chambers to pro se Plaintiff. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

DF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

LEONID LAUTMAN,

13-CV-967 (ARR) (VVP)

Plaintiff,

NOT FOR ELECTRONIC
OR PRINT PUBLICATION

-againstOPINION & ORDER
NORRIS MCLAUGHLIN & MARCUS, P.A.; DEAN M.
ROBERTS, ESQ.; and MIA D. FALLS,
Defendants.

x
ROSS, United States District Judge:
I have reviewed plaintiff's objections to Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky's order of June 25,
2014, see Dkt. #57, which was made on the record. Neither Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky's
denial of plaintiff's request that the magistrate recuse himself from plaintiff's case nor
Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky's setting of a discovery schedule against plaintiff's wishes after
plaintiff asked to be excused was "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a).
Accordingly, plaintiff's request that the orders be set aside is denied.
SO ORDERED.

/S/ Judge Allyne R. Ross
Allyne R: Reis'

·•· · '

United States District Judge
Dated:

July 22, 2014
Brooklyn, New York

··-~· ».·· ,_.,.,;,...·

SERVICE LIST
Leonid Lautman

2800 Coyle Street, Apt.# 322
Brooklyn, NY 11235