Alvarado v. Five Town Car Wash Inc. et al

Filing 24

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: In his 10/11/13 Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Orenstein recommends that the Court deny the letter motion of plaintiff to enforce an oral settlement agreement he entered with defendants. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation without qualification. Accordingly, plaintiff's letter motion is denied. Ordered by Judge Raymond J. Dearie on 1/21/2014. (Chee, Alvin)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------- )( LEONZO JOAQUIN CONSTANZA ALVARADO, Plaintiff, - against- ORDER 13 CV 1672 (RJD) (JO) FIVE TOWN CAR WASH, INC., et aI., Defendants. -------------------------------------------------------- )( DEARIE, District Judge. In his October II, 2013 Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 21), Magistrate Judge James Orenstein recommends that the Court deny the letter motion of plaintiff Leonzo Joaquin Constanza Alvarado to enforce an oral settlement agreement he entered with defendants Five Town Car Wash, Inc. and William Brown. (ECF No. 20). Although plaintiff did not file the required certification proving service of the Report and Recommendation on defendants by certified mail, all parties have since acknowledged receipt of the Report and Recommendation and concede that the time to file objections to the Report and Recommendation has e){pired. (See H'rg Mins., Jan. 7,2014, ECF No. 22). Having considered the papers submitted in connection with plaintiffs motion and the comprehensive analysis of Judge Orenstein, there being no objection to the same, the Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation without qualification. Accordingly, plaintiffs letter motion is denied. SO ORDERED. Dated: Brooklyn, New York January 21, 2014 /s/ Judge Raymond J. Dearie Rl(Y!9'ONW. DEARIE United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?