United States of America v. N.Y. Fish, Inc. et al

Filing 61

JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION in favor of United States of America against New York City Fish, Inc., Leonid Staroseletsky, Maxim Kutsyk, Pavel Roytkov. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 3/30/2014. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1

Filed 07/08/13

Page 1of 19 PageiD #: 2049

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

--------------------------------------------------------------)(
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-02909-RRM
v.

N.Y. FISH, INC., a corporation,
NEW YORK CITY FISH, INC., a corporation,
MAXIM KUTSYK, an individual,
PAVEL ROYTKOV, an individual,
LEONID STAROSELETSKY, an individual, and
STEVEN KOYFMAN, an individual,

PROPOSED ORDER OF
: PERMANENT INJUNCTION

Defendants.

--------------------------------------------------------------)(

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff, the United States of America, having filed a Complaint for Injunction against
N.Y. Fish, Inc., a corporation; New York City Fish, Inc., a corporation; and Maxim Kutsyk,
Pavel Roytkov, Leonid Staroseletsky, and Steven Koyfman, individuals (collectively,
"Defendants"), a Motion for Preliminary Injunction with a supporting memorandum of law, the
declarations of (1) Ronald M. Pace, Director of the New York District Office of the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration ("FDA"); (2) Mary E. Losikoff, Consumer Safety Officer, Office of
Food Safety, FDA's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition ("CFSAN"); and (3) Christine

E. Keys, Microbiologist, CFSAN's Office of Regulatory Science; a reply memorandum in further
support of its motion for preliminary injunction; a declaration in advance of trial from Peter M.
Trunk, Consumer Safety Officer, Director of FDA's New York District Office; a second
declaration in advance of trial from Mary Losikoff; and this Court having considered such
documents, all documents filed by Defendants, and the arguments and live testimony at the
hearing on July 9 and 10, 2013 consolidating the United States' Motion for Preliminary

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 2 of 19 PageID #: 2050

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 3 of 19 PageID #: 2051

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 4 of 19 PageID #: 2052

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 5 of 19 PageID #: 2053

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 6 of 19 PageID #: 2054

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 7 of 19 PageID #: 2055

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 8 of 19 PageID #: 2056

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 9 of 19 PageID #: 2057

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 10 of 19 PageID #: 2058

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 11 of 19 PageID #: 2059

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 12 of 19 PageID #: 2060

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 13 of 19 PageID #: 2061

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 14 of 19 PageID #: 2062

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 15 of 19 PageID #: 2063

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 16 of 19 PageID #: 2064

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 17 of 19 PageID #: 2065

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13 Page 18 of 19 PageID #: 2066

Case 1:13-cv-02909-RRM Document 38-1 Filed 07/08/13

Page 19 of 19 PageiD #: 2067

may be necessary and appropriate.
SO ORDERED:
Dated this 30 th day of March, 2014 

       Roslynn

R. Mauskopf 

HON. ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE