Harris v. City of New York et al
Filing
13
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Ordered by Judge John Gleeson on 10/3/2013. (Kim, Scarlet)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
RAHSAN HARRIS,
Plaintiff,
ORDER AND CIVIL JUDGMENT
- versus -
13-CV-4473
CITY OF NEW YORK; JAMAICA
HOSPITAL; DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS,
Defendants.
JOHN GLEESON, United States District Judge
On July 26, 2013, plaintiff Rahsan Harris, filed this pro se action pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 1983. 1 By order dated August 29, 2013, I dismissed the complaint, but granted Harris
30 days leave to file an amended complaint, ECF No. 11. I advised Harris that if he failed to
comply with the order within the time allowed, the case would be dismissed pursuant to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Harris has failed to respond
to my August 29, 2013 order. Accordingly, it is
1
The action was transferred to this Court from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York by order dated August 7, 2013, ECF No. 3.
1
ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: that the action is hereby dismissed
without prejudice. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). I certify pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order and Judgment would not be taken in good
faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. Coppedge v.
United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).
SO ORDERED.
John Gleeson, U.S.D.J.
Dated: October 3, 2013
Brooklyn, New York
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?