Harris v. City of New York et al

Filing 13

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Ordered by Judge John Gleeson on 10/3/2013. (Kim, Scarlet)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RAHSAN HARRIS, Plaintiff, ORDER AND CIVIL JUDGMENT - versus - 13-CV-4473 CITY OF NEW YORK; JAMAICA HOSPITAL; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants. JOHN GLEESON, United States District Judge On July 26, 2013, plaintiff Rahsan Harris, filed this pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 1 By order dated August 29, 2013, I dismissed the complaint, but granted Harris 30 days leave to file an amended complaint, ECF No. 11. I advised Harris that if he failed to comply with the order within the time allowed, the case would be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Harris has failed to respond to my August 29, 2013 order. Accordingly, it is 1 The action was transferred to this Court from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York by order dated August 7, 2013, ECF No. 3. 1 ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: that the action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). I certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order and Judgment would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. John Gleeson, U.S.D.J. Dated: October 3, 2013 Brooklyn, New York 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?