Balady, Inc. v. Elhindi et al
Filing
20
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, In this case, objections to Magistrate Judge Reyes's recommendations were due on 12/18/14. No objections to the Report were filed with this Court. Upon review of the recommendations, this Court adopts and affirms Magistrate Judge Reyes's Report in its entirety. The matter shall be recommitted to Magistrate Judge Reyes for post-judgment discovery and inquest. (Ordered by Judge Sterling Johnson, Jr on 12/19/2014) c/m (Galeano, Sonia)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
\
--------------------------------------------------)(
BROOKL·
\
BALADY, INC.,
Plaintiff,
14 CV 855 (SJ) (RER)
-against-
ORDER ADOPTING
REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
JENIN ELHINDI and BALADY WA
BALADAK FOOD CORP.,
Defendants.
-------------------------------------------------)(
APPEARANCES
COHEN TAUBER SPIEV ACK & WAGNER, LLP
420 Lexington Avenue
24th Floor
New York, NY 10170
By:
Leo L. Esses
Attorney for Plaintiff
JOHNSON, Senior District Judge:
Presently before the Court is a Report and Recommendation ("Report")
prepared by Magistrate Judge Raymond E. Reyes, Jr. Judge Reyes issued a very
thorough Report on December 3, 2014, and provided the parties with the requisite
amount of time to file objections. None of the parties filed any objections to the
Report. For the reasons stated herein, this Court affirms and adopts the Report in its
entirety.
1
--------~------------------------------·--·-··-· - -
P-049
A district court judge may designate a magistrate judge to hear and
determine certain motions pending before the Court and to submit to the Court
proposed findings of fact and a recommendation as to the disposition of the motion.
See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 14 days of service of the recommendation, any
party may file written objections to the magistrate's report. See id. Upon de novo
review of those portions of the record to which objections were made, the district
court judge may affirm or reject the recommendations. See id. The Court is not
required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal
conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the report and
recommendation to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474
U.S. 140, 150 (1985). In addition, failure to file timely objections may waive the
right to appeal this Court's Order. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l); Small v. Sec'y of
Health and Human Servs., 892 F.2d 15, 16 (2d Cir. 1989).
In this case, objections to Magistrate Judge Reyes's recommendations were
due on December 18, 2014. No objections to the Report were filed with this Court.
Upon review of the recommendations, this Court adopts and affirms Magistrate
Judge Reyes's Report in its entirety. The matter shall be recommitted to Magistrate
Judge Reyes for post-judgment discovery and inquest.
-·-· .....D._~0-~---- ----
SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 19, 2014
Brooklyn, NY
(?/ Ll5D:f -ro~soJ
SterYing 1011Ilson, Jr., U.S.D.J.
2
p.049
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?