Spencer v. The City of New York et al
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Over the last few weeks, Chambers has repeatedly attempted to contact defendants'counsel and has left no fewer than three voice messages. Counsel has not returned those calls. Therefore, the Court directs defendants' counsel to provide copies of the motion papers by no later than September 14, 2015 or defendants' motion will be deemed abandoned. Ordered by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 9/9/2015. (Fernandez, Erica)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------------------------JC
HAROLD SPENCER,
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
Plaintiff,
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
14-CV-2186 (CBA) (JO)
-againstTHE CITY OF NEW YORK and
JOHN DOES 1-3,
Defendants.
----------------------------------------------------- )(
AMON, Chief United States District Judge:
On June 15, 2015, defendants electronically filed a motion to dismiss the complaint with
the Court in violation of Rule 3(D) of the Court's Individual Rules. Once the motion was fully
briefed-on July 17, 2015--defendants again violated the Court's Individual Rules by failing to
provide courtesy copies of their motion papers. See Rules l(D), 3(D)(2). Defendants' failure to
send courtesy copies is particularly striking in this case as their motion relies on video footage
that has not been provided to the Court. (See Jacobs Ex. A (photocopy of the front of the disc
containing the video footage).)
Over the last few weeks, Chambers has repeatedly attempted to contact defendants'
counsel and has left no fewer than three voice messages. Counsel has not returned those calls.
Therefore, the Court directs defendants' counsel to provide copies of the motion papers by no
later than September 14, 2015 or defendants' motion will be deemed abandoned.
SO ORDERED.
'i,
Dated: September
2015
Brooklyn, New York
s/Carol Bagley Amon
cifol Bag!JYIAmoQ, 7
'
Chief United StateSlstrict Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?