Ferrera v. Tire Shop Center et al
Filing
29
MEMORDANUM and ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: There being no errors the Court adopts MJ Bloom's 28 Report and Recommendation without de novo review and grants plaintiffs motion 27 for default judgment. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 1/3/2017. (Innelli, Michael)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
--------------------------------------------------x
WILSON FERRERA,
Plaintiff,
-against-
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
14-cv-4657 (FB) (LB)
TIRE SHOP CENTER and
LEOMARES LUNA,
Defendants.
--------------------------------------------------x
Appearances:
For Plaintiff:
JODI JILL JAFFE
Jaffe Glenn Law Group, P.A.
301 North Harrison Street
Suite 9F #306
Princeton, NJ 08540
BLOCK, Senior District Judge:
On October 14, 2016, Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom issued a Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment
be granted and plaintiff be awarded $12,034.50 in damages, fees, and costs.
No
objections have been filed to date, and defendants’ opportunity to object has passed.
Where there are no objections, the Court may adopt the R&R without de novo
review. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149–50 (1985); Mario v. P & C Food Mkts.,
Inc., 313 F.3d 758, 766 (2d Cir. 2002) (“Where parties receive clear notice of the
consequences, failure timely to object to a magistrate’s report and recommendation
operates as a waiver of further judicial review of the magistrate’s decision.”). The Court
must conduct de novo review if it appears that the magistrate judge may have committed
plain error. See Spence v. Superintendent, Great Meadow Corr. Facility, 219 F.3d 162,
174 (2d Cir. 2000). No such error appears here. Accordingly, the Court adopts the
R&R without de novo review and grants plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment.
SO ORDERED.
/S/ Frederic Block______
FREDERIC BLOCK
Senior United States District Judge
Brooklyn, New York
January 3, 2016
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?