Perez v. Queens Boro Yang Cleaner, Inc. et al

Filing 27

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. See attached. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. Ordered by Judge Sterling Johnson, Jr on 4/5/2016. (Figeroux, Davina)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------------------------------X
LOURDES PEREZ,
Plaintiff,
14 CV 7310 (SJ) (JO)
-against-

ORDER ADOPTING
REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION

QUEENS BORO YANG CLEANERS, et al.,
Defendant.
-------------------------------------------------------X
APPEARANCES
CILENTI & COOPER PC
708 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10017
By:
Giustino Cilenti
Attorneys for Plaintiff

JOHNSON, Senior District Judge:
Presently before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (“Report”)
prepared by Magistrate Judge James Orenstein. Judge Orenstein issued the Report
on March 17, 2016, and provided the parties until April 4, 2016 to file any
objections. Neither party filed any objections to the Report. For the reasons stated
herein, this Court affirms and adopts the Report in its entirety.
A district court judge may designate a magistrate judge to hear and
determine certain motions pending before the Court and to submit to the Court
proposed findings of fact and a recommendation as to the disposition of the motion.
1

See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within 10 days of service of the recommendation, any
party may file written objections to the magistrate’s report. See id. Upon de novo
review of those portions of the record to which objections were made, the district
court judge may affirm or reject the recommendations. See id. The Court is not
required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal
conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the report and
recommendation to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474
U.S. 140, 150 (1985). In addition, failure to file timely objections may waive the
right to appeal this Court=s Order. See 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1); Small v. Sec=y of
Health and Human Servs., 892 F.2d 15, 16 (2d Cir. 1989).
In this case, objections to Magistrate Judge Orenstein=s recommendations
were due on April 4, 2016. No objections to the Report were filed with this Court.
Upon review of the recommendations, this Court adopts and affirms Magistrate
Judge Orenstein’s Report in its entirety. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close
the case.

SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 5, 2016
Brooklyn, NY

_________/s/___________________
Sterling Johnson, Jr., U.S.D.J.

2