Moore v. Caine et al
Filing
8
ORDER: Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, requests a 6 certificate of Defendants' default and in an attached 7 affirmation asserts that Defendants have been served with the complaint and summons but have failed to appea r or respond. However, the U.S. Marshals Service is effecting service of the complaint and summons on Plaintiff's behalf and has not yet filed proof of service. Until proof of service on both defendants is filed, any 6 request for default must be denied. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on 6/16/2015. C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
ftLEO
u.e IH ~OFFICE
ยท *"*'eot."'1" 1.0.N.Y
* JUN 1 6 2015 *
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------)(
l!ltOOK.LYH OFPICE
ANDRE MOORE,
ORDER
15 CV 2062 (CBA)(LB)
Plaintiff,
-againstLIEUTENANT CAINE and LALCHAN SINGH
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------)(
BLOOM, United States Magistrate Judge:
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, requests a certificate of Defendants' default and in an
attached affirmation asserts that Defendants have been served with the complaint and summons but have
failed to appear or respond. (ECF Nos. 6, 7.) However, the U.S. Marshals Service is effecting service of
the complaint and summons on Plaintiffs behalf and has not yet filed proof of service. Until proof of
service on both defendants is filed, any request for default must be depied.
SO ORDERED.
/S/ Judge Lois Bloom
LOI~ffiOM United States Magistrate Judge
Dated: June 16, 2015
Brooklyn, New York
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?