Moore v. Caine et al

Filing 8

ORDER: Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, requests a 6 certificate of Defendants' default and in an attached 7 affirmation asserts that Defendants have been served with the complaint and summons but have failed to appea r or respond. However, the U.S. Marshals Service is effecting service of the complaint and summons on Plaintiff's behalf and has not yet filed proof of service. Until proof of service on both defendants is filed, any 6 request for default must be denied. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on 6/16/2015. C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

ftLEO

u.e IH ~OFFICE
· *"*'eot."'1" 1.0.N.Y

* JUN 1 6 2015 *

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------)(

l!ltOOK.LYH OFPICE

ANDRE MOORE,

ORDER
15 CV 2062 (CBA)(LB)

Plaintiff,
-againstLIEUTENANT CAINE and LALCHAN SINGH
Defendants.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------)(

BLOOM, United States Magistrate Judge:

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, requests a certificate of Defendants' default and in an
attached affirmation asserts that Defendants have been served with the complaint and summons but have
failed to appear or respond. (ECF Nos. 6, 7.) However, the U.S. Marshals Service is effecting service of
the complaint and summons on Plaintiffs behalf and has not yet filed proof of service. Until proof of
service on both defendants is filed, any request for default must be depied.
SO ORDERED.

/S/ Judge Lois Bloom
LOI~ffiOM United States Magistrate Judge

Dated: June 16, 2015
Brooklyn, New York