Heinz-Wright v. The City of New York et al

Filing 30

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons stated in the attached Order, the Court adopts in its entirety the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Scanlon. Plaintiff's motion to amend (Doc. Nos. 17 , 25 ) is denied. This action is re-committed to Magistrate Judge Scanlon for supervision of discovery and all other pre-trial matters. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 6/29/2016. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------X KARL HEINZ-WRIGHT, Plaintiff, ORDER 15-CV-3269 (RRM) (VMS) - against THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants. ------------------------------------------------------------------X ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF, United States District Judge. On September 10, 2015, plaintiff Karl Heinz-Wright requested a pre-motion conference seeking to amend his complaint. (Letter Requesting Pre-Mot. Conference (Doc. No. 11).) By Order entered October 30, 2015, this Court referred that request and any associated motion to the assigned Magistrate Judge, the Honorable Vera M. Scanlon. Judge Scanlon ordered full briefing on the issue. (See Mot. to Amend/Correct/Suppl. Pl.’s Compl. (Doc. No. 17); Def. Mot. in Opp. (Doc. No. 18); Pl. Suppl. Mot. (Doc. No. 25); Def. Reply in Opp. (Doc. No. 27).) On June 3, 2016, Judge Scanlon issued a Report and Recommendation (the “R&R”) recommending that Heinz-Wright’s motion be denied. Judge Scanlon reminded the parties that, pursuant to Rule 72(b), any objections to the R&R were due by June 20, 2016. No party has filed any objection. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, the Court has reviewed the R&R for clear error and, finding none, concurs with the R&R in its entirety. See Covey v. Simonton, 481 F. Supp. 2d 224, 226 (E.D.N.Y. 2007). Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth by Magistrate Judge Scanlon in her thorough and well-reasoned R&R, i Heinz-Wright’s motion to amend (Doc. Nos. 17, 25) is denied. SO ORDERED. Roslynn R. Mauskopf Dated: Brooklyn, New York June 29, 2016 ____________________________________ ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?