Cordero v. City of New York et al

Filing 56

Minute Entry and Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Marilyn D. Go on 7/5/16. Appearances by G. Harvis, B. Fett for plaintiff; A. Booth for defendants. Argument heard and rulings made on the record granting in part and denying in par t 50 defendants' motion to preclude discovery, as summarized in the attached order. Defendants' 55 motion to extend the deadline for completion of fact discovery is granted on consent. A new discovery schedule will be set at the next conference scheduled for 8/8/16 at 1:30 p.m. (tel.) (Tape #FTR 10:37-12:21.) (Proujansky, Josh)

United States District Court
Eastern District of New York
MINUTE ORDER
15cv3436 (JBW)(MDG) Cordero v. City of New York, et al.,
This order summarizes rulings made on the record during a
conference held on July 5, 2016. Defendants' [50] motion to
preclude discovery is granted in part and denied in part, as
discussed below.
1. Defendants must produce the closing report for IA 0820922 (item #1 on page 5 of ct. doc. 50).
2. Defendants must provide to the Court for in camera review
by 8/4/16 the charging document and/or closing report for CC220/10
(item #3); performance monitoring noted on bates stamp D 260-61;
IA 2015-08235, OG 2015-4680 (item # 12); IA05-21922 (item # 16);
IA12-12765 (item # 19); 2015-30282, C2015-809 (item # 22); IA0739625 (item # 25); IA06-15753 (item #28); 12-66488 (item #33); and
14-1020 (item #34).
3. The City must produce by 7/12/16 an affidavit from an
NYPD official as to any investigation that it claims was closed
but was noted in the indices produced as an open investigation.
Defendants must also provide revised indices reflecting this
information.
4. The City must make a further search for the performance
evaluations of the defendant officers for the last 5 years and
provide a report to the Court by 7/12/16.
5. Defendants must produce by 7/19/16 an index for any
disciplinary charges that arose since the last index provided.
6. Plaintiff must produce the first page of his federal tax
return, the relevant pages of his state tax return, and all other
relevant pages showing his income.
7.
Defendants may, with plaintiff's consent, file a
proposed order for the unsealing of the arrest and prosecution
records of plaintiff's co-defendant.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:

Brooklyn, New York
July 5, 2016
_/s/__________________________
MARILYN D. GO
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE