Williams v. City of New York et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. So Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 9/8/2017. (Tavarez, Jennifer)
IN CLERK'S OFFICE
US DISTRICT COURT E.D.N.Y
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
SEP 11 2017 ^
NOT FOR ELECTRONIC
OR PRINT PUBLICATION
CITY OF NEW YORK; NEW YORK CITY POLICE
DEPARTMENT; JEFFREY AUST; "JOHN DOE
AND JANE DOE 1-10"; RICHMOND COUNTY
DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE; "JOHN ROE
AND MARY ROE 1-10"; NEW YORK CITY
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;"JAMES DOE
AND MARY DOE 1-10,"
ROSS,United States District Judge:
The court has received the Report and Recommendation on the instant case, dated August
24,2017,from the Honorable Robert Levy, United States Magistrate Judge. The deadline for
filing objections has passed and no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the court has
reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error on the face ofthe record. See
Advisory Comm. Notes to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); accord Brissett v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface
Transit Operating Auth.. No. 09-CV-1930682(CBA)
(LB),2011 WL 1930682, at *1 (E.D.N.Y.
May 19,2011). Having reviewed the record, I find no clear error. I hereby adopt the Report and
Recommendation in its entirety as the opinion ofthe Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Therefore, the case is dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute.
s/ Allyne R. Ross
United Stai s District
September 8, 2017
Brooklyn, New York
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?